Court Orders Obasanjo To File Defense In Libel Suit

An FCT High Court on Tuesday ordered former President Olusegun Obasanjo to file a statement of defense in a libel suit brought against him by a chieftain of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, Buruji Kashamu.

Justice Velentine Ashi gave the order when counsel to Obasanjo, Ojugwu Akana, made oral application for an extension of time to file the statement.

Akana told the court that he filed a motion on May 5 seeking an order of the court to grant extension of time to file their statement of defense, explaining that the extension of time would enable them to file the statement of their witness on oath.

Read this also:  Allow your girls to finish secondary school, Shettima warns Borno parents against child marriage

“My lord, this extension will enable us to get a copy of the judgment of Court of Appeal in Illinois, the United States of America. My lord, this judgment is vital in the defense of our case because a high court in Illinois had earlier ruled that Kashamu has a case to answer. He appealed the ruling because he was not satisfied with the decision of the court in Illinois,” he said.

Read this also:  Is it lawful for Nigeria Police to parade suspects? Certainly not, reply lawyers

Akana objected to granting any cost to Kashamu, as this was the first time the case was being adjourned at the instance of the defendant.

The applicant, Kashamu, had filed the suit in March over a letter Obasanjo allegedly wrote to President Goodluck Jonathan which referred to him as “a criminal and fugitive wanted in the United States.’’

Kashamu is asking the court to award him N200 million as the cost of damages he suffered due to the alleged libel.
Counsel to Kashamu, Kenneth Omoruan, did not object to the oral application.

Read this also:  Lecturer demanded sex in return for better grades, Nigerian student says

Omoruan, however, prayed the court for N200,000 cost that the adjournment might cause him.

Justice Ashi awarded N20,000 cost against Obasanjo and subsequently adjourned the case until June 10 for definite hearing.

Comments

comments

Comment on this: