back to top

Court Punishes Airtel For Unsolicited Messages

court-punishes-airtel-for-unsolicited-messages


A Federal Capital Territory, FCT, High Court has ordered one of Nigeria’s top telecommunications company, Airtel, to pay the sum of N5 million to one Emmanuel Anene, for violating his right to privacy.

Justice Jude Okeke delivered the unprecedented judgement on Wednesday in a suit filed by Anene in December last year, alleging constant disturbance by Airtel through unsolicited messages to his telephone line.

The complainant had asked for N200 million in damages but the trial judge only granted him N5 million.

Justice Okeke held that “Putting into consideration the obvious inconveniences, discomfort and embarrassments, the plaintiff had undeniably gone through, the defendant has been directed to pay to the plaintiff damages, not the N200 million the plaintiff asked for but N5 million only.”

The judge added that the issue for determination was whether the plaintiff’s evidence made out a case to justify the claims in the reliefs he sought.

“A plaintiff who seeks reliefs for violation of right is to succeed on the strength of his case and not on the weakness or absence of the defence, though he can rely on the absence of the defence to support his case,” Okeke said.

He also stated that the failure of the defendant to enter a defence in the case further proves that the plaintiff was right.




     

     

    “The defendant, who was afforded the opportunity, failed to file a statement of defence contradicting the plaintiff’s statement of claim, or lead evidence in challenge to the claims; it means he has admitted the facts.

    Read Also:

    “Unless the court does not believe in the evidence or sees any reason in contrary in law, it reserves a duty to act on such.

    “The defendant failed to place any evidence on the other scale of balance; there is nothing against which the plaintiff’s evidence can be weighed.”

    “In every wrong, there must be a remedy. To vindicate the plaintiff’s right which has been violated in the forth going circumstance by the defendant, the plaintiff shall be awarded damages based on the discretion of the court,” he said.

    Join the ICIR WhatsApp channel for in-depth reports on the economy, politics and governance, and investigative reports.

    Support the ICIR

    We invite you to support us to continue the work we do.

    Your support will strengthen journalism in Nigeria and help sustain our democracy.

    If you or someone you know has a lead, tip or personal experience about this report, our WhatsApp line is open and confidential for a conversation

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here


    Support the ICIR

    We need your support to produce excellent journalism at all times.

    -Advertisement-

    Recent

    - Advertisement