Home Blog Page 2633

Take $3,500 and leave our country or go to jail, Israel tells 20,000 African migrants

 

Benjamin Netanyahu, Israeli Prime Minister, says Israel is no longer home to 20,000 male African migrants, as his government has given them two months to leave the country or risk being thrown in jail.

Isreali government says the migrants are “infiltrators” looking for work rather than asylum, but there is a growing liberal backlash against the plan, including from rabbis, a small group of survivors of the Nazi Holocaust and ordinary people who say Israel should show greater compassion to the migrants.

It argues that the small State of Israel cannot accommodate such large number of “illegal infiltrators”.

According to Reuters, Netanyahu’s government is offering the migrants, most of whom are from Sudan and Eritrea, $3,500 and a plane ticket to what it says is a safe destination in another country in sub-Saharan Africa.

At the moment, the fate of some 37,000 Africans in Israel is posing a moral dilemma for a state founded as haven for Jews from persecution and a national home.

The right-wing government is under pressure from its nationalist voter base to expel the migrants, while others are calling for them to be taken in.

The first eviction notices were handed out on Sunday and job advertisements for immigration inspectors to implement the deportation plan have been posted on government websites.

Rights groups advocating on behalf of the migrants say many fled abuse and war and their expulsion, even to a different country in Africa, would endanger them further.

“I don’t know what to do. Rwanda, Uganda are not my countries, what will a third [world] country help me [with]?” said Eritrean Berihu Ainom, after receiving an eviction notice on Sunday.

The deportation notices do not name the country that the migrants would be flown to but Netanyahu has said it will be a safe destination. Rights groups have named Uganda and Rwanda as possible host countries.

In a poor neighborhood in the south of Tel Aviv that has attracted thousands of African migrants, shops are dotted with signs in Tigrinya and other African languages, while abandoned warehouses have been converted into churches.

“I came to Israel to save my life,” said Eritrean Afoworki Kidane, sitting on a street bench.

He said he would rather go to jail than take the cash and plane ticket on offer to leave the country that has been his home for nine years.

Aryeh Deri,Interior Minister, said Israel’s first obligation was to its own citizens rather than the migrants.

“They are not numbers, they are people, they are human and I am full of compassion and mercy,” Deri told Army Radio. “But the small state of Israel cannot contain such a vast number of illegal infiltrators.”

But opposition to the plan has been building and some Israelis are now offering to take migrants at risk of expulsion into their homes.

On Thursday, a group of 36 Holocaust survivors sent a letter to Netanyahu asking him not to deport the migrants. The U.S.-based Anti Defamation League has also urged Israel to reconsider the plan, citing “Jewish values and refugee heritage”.

I’m ready to replace Buhari in 2019, says 70-year-old Jonah Jang

 

Jonah Jang, 70-year-old former Governor of Plateau State, says he is ready to replace President Muhammadu Buhari when his tenure expires in 2019, if the Nigerian people find him worthy.

Jang, however, added that he would need to “confide in my creator first” before making the decision to run for Nigeria’s number one office next year.

Addressing journalists at his residence in Jos, Jang also stated that there are particular elective positions that are best occupied by older persons, for instance, the Senate.

He pointed that that the House of Representatives is always characterised by rowdy sessions because majority of the members are young.

“I’m in politics to serve my people. If Nigerians really feel I can be President, why not? But I will have to confide in my creator (God) first,” he said.

On the recent statements by ex-Presidents Olusegun Obasanjo and Ibrahim Bbangida, Jang said the former leaders spoke the minds of majority of Nigerians, adding that the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) had performed way below expectation.

“Former President Olusegun Obasanjo, and General Ibrahim Babangida just expressed their feelings among many Nigerians. Probably, they voted for him (Buhari) in 2015, and they are just telling him that we won’t give you our votes again.

“But for God sake, they have done nothing wrong. They have the right to express how they feel about his government.

“Most Nigerians did same during Goodluck Jonathan’s administration even when he was trying his best. Why will Buhari’s own become an exception?”

“I don’t understand the reason for the blame game (by APC). If till today, after two years in governance, the APC administration is blaming PDP for it failures, then the time is up for them to leave.”

On why the Senate is better occupied by older people, Jang said: “If you have hot heads of youthful nature in the Senate and House of representatives, what kind of laws do you think the National Assembly will produce for Nigerians?

“That is why the House of Representative is always rowdy, full of young people, though we have a few of them in the Senate, the likes of Dino. That is why I said Senate is not for the young ones.

“And in Hausa language, the senate is called ‘Maijelisan Datibai’, meaning ‘assembly of elders’, so where is the position of the youth here?”

Also commenting on the relationship between him and his successor, Jang said he has not met with Simon Lalong, current Plateau State Governor, since he assumed office.

He explained that he had reached out to Lalomg shortly before the latter’s inauguration into office, but it was ignored.

“Shortly before Lalong was inaugurated as governor, I personally invited him to talk with him. I wrote him a letter that I personally signed, but he never came nor has he replied me till today.

“As we speak, I have not seen Lalong since he became Governor. For God sake, even by age, I am older than Lalong. I’m above 70 years. He should pay me homage as an elder in this state,” he said.

Court adjourns hearing after Metuh arrives in a stretcher

 

Justice Okon Abang has adjourned the trial of Olisa Metuh, former National Publicity Secretary of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), after the accused person was brought to court in an ambulance and stretchered into the court room.

Metuh is standing trial over allegations that he received N400 million from Sambo Dasuki, former National Security Adviser (NSA), and also for money laundering charges to the tune of $2 billion.

Metuh had to be in court on Monday as the presiding judge had threatened to revoke his bail if he failed to attend the day’s hearing on the pretence of illness.

But on seeing Metuh on stretchers, Justice Abang had no choice but to adjourn the case till March 15.

“I have seen the condition that the first defendant is. Seeing the condition, I am inclined to adjourn this matter to allow the first defendant attend his trial,” he ruled.

Private guards were hired to prevent journalists from taking  pictures of Metuh on the stretcher.

During the last hearing, Justice Abang cautioned Onyechi Ikpeazu, Metuh’s counsel, over “the delay tactics” being employed by the defence team in order to frustrate the proceedings.

Metuh being stretchered into the court. Photo Credit: PUNCH

Ikpeazu had told the court that his client was hospitalised at the Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital in Nnewi, Anambra State with a disease that had affected his spinal cord, but Justice Abang would have none of it.

Describing Metuh’s medical report as “a useless paper meant for a trash bin”, Abang said that “the person who submitted that letter must be known to the court, in this instant case, he is unknown”.

“The court of law cannot rely on a public document tendered by a none party in a suit. It has no charge number and violated the three ways by which a public document can be submitted before a court,” Abang said.

“This court shall henceforth not accept any other medical report issued by any medical doctor in Nigeria until the trial is concluded.

“I hereby suspend my decision revoking the bail. It is expected that the defendant will turn a new leaf, show compulsion and attend his trial on February 5 and 6.

“If he fails to appear in court on these dates fixed for continuation of his trial, his bail shall be revoked and he will be remanded in prison custody.”

Afegbua insists: I’ve been doing this job for 14 years… Babangida signed that statement

 

Kassim Afegbua, media aide to Ibrahim Babaginda, former military Head of State, has defended his initial statement in which Babangida urged President Muhammadu Buhari not to allow his personal ambition override the national interest.

Afegbua said this during Channel Television’s Sunday Politics, stressing that he got Babangida’s “authorisation and commitment” before releasing the statement.

“I have been doing this job for about 14 years now. And I have never issued a statement on behalf of the former head of state and he gave a rebuttal,” Afegbua said.

“I got authorisation and commitment from him before I issued the statement. It has been in process. He has called me to say that the statement still stands.”

Soon after the first press statement was published, Babangida released another statement he personally signed, saying he had “unfettered access” to Buhari and had no reason to resort to “sensational public correspondence”.

“Let me categorically state that as former President and Statesman, I have unfettered channel of communication with the highest authorities without sensational public correspondence, therefore those views  expressed over there are personal views of the writer,” the statement read.

But Afegbua maintained that the statement he issued was crosschecked and approved by Babangida.

“Of course, you know IBB is for everyone. People want to love him more than he loves himself. People want to appreciate him more than he appreciates himself. People want to play the role of IBB,” he said.

“So when the statement was released, some of his friends saw it and they felt we were trying to put the former president on a collision course with the president. So, they went and did a statement to deny that.

“But I have since spoken to him; he called me and said, that statement stands. The kernel of that statement should inform public discourse and not necessarily people personalising it as if it were to be against the sitting president.

“So, the statement stands and I have since communicated to all the media houses that they should respect that statement as coming from IBB. It did not emanate from my head. We sat down, we discussed and articulated them.”

Afegbua further clarified that Babangida’s statement was not a personal attack on the person of Buhari.

“He is not personalizing his statement against the incumbent president. But he is saying, as a stakeholder and a concerned Nigerian, that he shares in the aspirations of the people.”

The youth must pledge: no candidate above 45 years in 2019!

0

 

By Fredrick Nwabufo

I was invited to a meeting of the Coalition for Nigeria by one of the “fathers” of the movement. Before the meeting, I had a chat with this patriotic Nigerian who told me: “Fred, our time is past; Nigeria should be in the hands of your generation. It is left for you (the youth) to take back the country, this is the mission of this coalition.”

Honestly, I would have thought that these words were a tapestry of chicanery if they were from another source. I saw the candour and urgency in his voice, but I thought to myself, could I be used? What is in it for this person? After pensive ratiocination, I concluded that this was a 911 call to action. But I am yet to give a verdict on the movement.

Nigeria needs a generational shift of power in 2019. Our fathers have lost vision, and they are chasing a will-o-the-wisp. The Nigeria young should be given space in the leadership cockpit.

I know young citizens are suspicious of one another; I also know that there are fears that if the ark of leadership is on the shoulders of young people the country may wobble and sink into the abyss of anarchy.

In fact, a friend expressed this fear on my Facebook wall.

He said: “Nobody is going to give the youth a chance to rule this nation, but the youth have to come out and compete with the old folks. Moreover, you never can tell how corrupt the minds of so many of them are. In fact, in this materialistic era, we are bound to experience greater corruption with the youth at the helm of affairs than we are seeing today.

“Saraki was a governor in his youthful days what value did he add to the land and people of Kwara state? Saminu Turaki, Makarfi, Donald Duke and even Yahaya Bello of Kogi state. Please my brother let us do away with these youthful sentiments, and focus on how to use your pen to right the wrongs going on in our nation today. My experience working and socialising with my peers (the youth), had made me realise that 90 percent of our young ones today in Nigeria don’t just want to lead or rule but they want to be billionaire statesmen.”

My response to all young people who harbour this fear is: “I agree we have corrupt young men and women, and that we also have incompetent young men and women, but I believe we have a greater number of principled and competent young men and women than the obverse who can effect seismic progress in the country. Let the young at least try, if they fail, they will get back up and run. The Nigeria young should make a pledge – no to any candidate above 45 years.”

Now, I am not endorsing the possible manipulations of the strong and old political class to install some dim-wit or entitled offspring of theirs – who can serve their selfish agenda just because such an individual falls within the age bracket being suggested here, but to get us to embrace the possibilities of a young, aware, vibrant, healthy, intelligent, smart and decisive individual who can run the affairs of the nation for four to eight years and still have enough lifeblood in him to proffer realistic solutions even after he has handed the baton of leadership to a successor.

In conclusion, we cannot keep holding ourselves back with the spectre of fear. I believe the present and the future matter to us more than to our parents who are already knocking on heaven’s gate. We need the youth to solve the problems of our country with new methods, vigour and ideas, and not with old and tired hands and ideas. The problems of the 21st century require the ideas of the new age.

Fredrick is a journalist.

You can reach him on Twitter: @FredrickNwabufo, Facebook: Fredrick Nwabufo

Egotistical senate versus Hameed Ali and the rest of us

1

 

Big egos are a big part of the human nature. As man is naturally a political animal, egos are a big part of politics. Outside politics, egos are in high supply. In boardrooms and the rest of the corporate world, for example, ego clashes are fueled by intellection and the contestation of ideas — by the unwillingness of a first-grade intellectual to think nobody else can/should possess a superior idea to his. The basis for this ego, though no less destructive, is understandable. But there’s a very caustic, fetid kind of ego — the one motivated by money and power. In the Nigerian Senate, there is an abundance of it. Twice last week, a couple of senators supplied the evidence.

Let’s start with the latter. On Tuesday,  a security aide of Abiodun Olujimi, a PDP senator representing Ekiti South (also the Deputy Minority Whip of the Senate), ordered her aide to slap Kingsley Oti, a National Assembly staff, specifically the Provost of the Parliamentary Staff Association of Nigeria (PASAN). An account of the incident by both parties identifies the cause of the clash as the attempt by Olujimi’s aides to bar Oti from entering an elevator reserved for senators. Whereas Olujimi should have reprimanded his aide for slapping Oti (who wasted little time in returning the favours), she instead dragged him away from the scene by grabbing his shirt by the buttons. Shambolic public display of power.

Who, by the way, are senators that staff of the National Assembly cannot share elevators with? Some gods that must be worshipped or demi-gods in whose presence mere mortals must cringe in fear? Is Olujimi no longer one of those public office aspirants who, every four years, beg Oti and the rest of us for votes — well, in addition to vote buying and stealing? By separating their own elevators from those used by staff and visitors to the National Assembly, the senators take us more than six decades back to the era of racial discrimination in the United States when coloured passengers were barred from occupying the whites-only section even if theirs was filled up and the whites’ had spaces. There is real cause for worry if in a democracy, the lawmakers consider themselves more important than the people whom they were elected to serve.

Tuesday’s incident can be passed off as a classic case of the elephant (Olujimi) thumping the grass (Oti), but the previous day’s bears no such colouration. Five senators —  Samuel Anyanwu (Imo East), Gilbert Nnaji (Enugu East), Hamman Isah Misau (Bauchi Central), Babajide Omoworare (Osun East) and ringleader Dino Melaye (Kogi West) — were at the headquarters of the Nigeria Customs Service (NCS), as members of the Ad- hoc Committee on Economic Waste in Customs. Rather than busy themselves with the ‘juicy’ matter of economic waste, the senators began the meeting by whining about how Hameed Ali, the NCS Comptroller-General, was not standing at the entrance of the building to welcome them.

“Mr CG, rather than meeting us here at the conference room, by way of courtesy, you were supposed to have met us at the ground floor on arrival into the premises,” Melaye, Chairman of the committee, had said as the meeting commenced. “That has been the practice of statutory bodies headed by chief executive officers like you. Relevant Senate committees have over the years been accorded this by bosses of Immigration Service, Prison Service etc, making us to wonder why it is not so here today under your leadership… If this thing happens next time, we will stage a walkout.”

The retired soldier that he is, Ali took the battle straight to them, one notch higher in fact. “We have our own protocol as regards receiving visitors like you. I don’t need to come downstairs to receive you just as nobody in the Senate or House of Representatives has ever come out to receive us anytime we visit the National Assembly,” he said, before adding: “Let me state clearly that we in the Nigeria Customs Service are servants of the people. We believe in Nigeria and working with others to make it great without being railroaded in any way… On your assignment you called economic waste, we shall cooperate with you to unearth whatever you want to unearth and effect any correction if there is any.”

Angered by the return of fire for fire, the senators declined to take a group photograph with the Customs management at the end of the meeting, prompting the CG to abandon them in the conference room and block their bus at the gate of the premises with his convoy to ensure that it was him rather than the lawmakers who walked out on the other party. He ensured he held them up for at least 15minutes after the meeting ended.

Ali’s eye-for-an-eye methods are somewhat questionable, but that sort of ridicule is what you get when the third estate of the realm continues overstretching its limits and fails to rein in its ego. In any case, the entire ‘economic waste’ probe is nothing more than a gluttonous peep into the Customs to see what ‘leftovers’ can be appropriated by the Senate. That was the practice before Ali’s appointment, that was the crux of the uniform-or-no-uniform saga of 2016/2017, that is why the Senate detests Ali, and that is why the Senate and the retired colonel will have to endure their cat-and-mouse relationship for at least another year.

The public conduct of these senators is a dead giveaway of their behaviour in the hallowed chambers of the National Assembly and in private when no eyes are watching. Little wonder we are still angling for the passage of the PIB — a four-set document with real potentials to revolutionalise the oil and gas sector — after 18 years, yet our lawmakers are more interested in the happenings in the NGO world and, with the NGO Bill, are desperate to enthrone an NGO Regulatory Commission that would wield suspicious powers as the “power to facilitate and coordinate the activities of NGOs (Section 7) — whatever that means, power to receive and discuss annual reports of NGOs (Section 8), power to provide policy guidelines to NGOs (Section 81c) and power to approve projects of NGOs (Section 26).

These ego-drunk legislators will take us nowhere. Unfortunately, we’re stuck with them for at least one year or probably longer.

Soyombo, Editor of the International Centre for Investigative Reporting (ICIR), tweets @fisayosoyombo

IBB disowns press statement, says I won’t do ‘sensational public correspondence’

 

Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida (retd.), former Military President, has disowned a statement signed and distributed by Kassim Afegbua, his media aide.

The widely-circulated statement had quoted IBB as advising President Muhammadu Buhari not to seek re-election in 2019 and urging Nigerians to vote for “younger blood” in 2019.

However, the new statement, signed by IBB, noted that he had unfettered access to Buhari and that where necessary, he would speak to the President in camera instead of writing a public statement.

THE IBB-SIGNED STATEMENT

MY COUNSEL TO THE NATION–BY GENERAL IBRAHIM BADAMASI BABANGIDA, GCFR

Distinguished Members of the Fourth estate of the realm.

It has been drawn to my attention a press statement on the State of the nation, particularly 2019 general elections and beyond.

Let me categorically state that as former President and Statesman, I have unfettered channel of communication with the highest authorities without sensational public correspondence, therefore those views  expressed over there are personal views of the writer.

However, with due respect to individual opinion and constitutional rights,  it is worrisome that Political events and civil unrest in many part of the country, have raised many questions on the governance and unity. Indeed 2018 is inundated with seasons of literature on the corporate existence of this country. Many of such literature have shown concerns of the corporate existence of Nigeria beyond 2019 general election.

It will be recalled that in my message to this year’s Armed Forces Remembrance Day, I specifically expressed the dire need for proactive measures to stop farmers/herders clashes in the middle belt, Cattle rustling, armed robbery, Kidnapping, gangsterism and Cultism. Our security agencies have to step up surveillance with more efforts on intelligence gathering for maximum success.

Recent happenings and utterances by political gladiators is alarming and not in the interest of common man that is already overstretched and apparently living from hand to mouth due to precarious economic conditions. Despite all these challenges, I am optimistic that the political actors will play within the ambit of political norms and decorum to ameliorate the problems facing our society now.

I am a realist that believes in all issues in a democratic atmosphere are sincerely discussed and resolved in the spirit of give and take. Since after  my military years that metamorphosed to the only Military President in the history of Nigeria and my civilian life, I always have one clear objective that freedom can only be achieved through democracy. Some people find this freedom as an avenue for eroding democracy by antics of hate speeches under the guise of religion, tribal or self-imposed mentorship. This trend of pitching political class and the people is unhealthy and skewed.

The clamour for re-alignment of governance in the country as we are approaching 2019 election year is a welcome development only if the agitations are genuinely channeled through legislation and total supremacy of the constitution . Any attempt outside this circle of democratic tenants is deceptive and divisive idea capable of plunging our political journey into disarray.

Our present political parties and their structures need parameter pillars that will make them more strong with unique ideologies. However, our present political parties need surgical operation that will fusion them in to a reasonable numbers. I have been an advocate of two-party systems but in our present reality in Nigeria, our political parties can fusion into strong political association/party that can form a formidable opposition to a ruling party.

As students of history, we are aware that many advanced democracies have two distinct ideological political parties, with a handful of smaller political parties that serve as buffer whenever any of the known political parties derailed or became unpopular. I still believe in two party systems as the best option for Nigeria.

It is high time that, we dialogue more on any issue in order to have a political solution on any problem affecting us. It is sad that, Nigeria had its fare share of conflicts, and we cannot continue to fall back to those dark years of bloodshed.

As a people, now is the time to come together to address all Communal conflicts and criminality under any guise to further unite the country in line with the vision of our founding fathers so that as a nation, we can forge ahead in the task of building a more prosperous nation.

SIGNED:

GENERAL IBRAHIM BADAMASI BABANGIDA GCFR, FORMER MILITARY PRESIDENT & COMMANDER IN-CHIEF OF NIGERIAN ARMED FORCES.

1 UPHILL DRIVE, MINNA.

SUNDAY, 04TH FEBRUARY, 2018.

‘We need younger blood in 2019’ — Babangida opposes 2nd term for Buhari

 

Ibrahim Babangida, former Military Head of State, has urged Nigerians to “enthrone younger blood into the mainstream of our political leadership starting from 2019”.

He said that although he does not “intend to deny President Buhari his inalienable right to vote and be voted for, there comes a time in the life of a nation when personal ambition should not override national interest”.

Babangida made this known in a statement released on Sunday, containing his thoughts on the state of the nation.

“This is the time for us to reinvent the wheel and tap into the resourcefulness of the younger generation, stimulate their entrepreneurial initiatives and provoke a conduce environment to grow national economy both at the micro and macro levels,” he added.

“The next election in 2019 therefore presents us a unique opportunity to … provoke fresh leadership that would immediately begin the process of healing the wounds in the land and ensuring that the wishes and aspirations of the people are realized in building and sustaining national cohesion and consensus.”

THE FULL TEXT OF THE STATEMENT

In the past few months and weeks, I have played host to many concerned Nigerians who have continued to express legitimate and patriotic worry about the state of affairs in the country. Some of them have continued to agonize about the turn of events and expressly worried why we have not gotten our leadership compass right as a country with so much potential and opportunity for all. Some, out of frustration, have elected to interrogate the leadership question and wondered aloud why it has taken this long from independence till date to discover the right model on account of our peculiarities. At 57, we are still a nation in search of the right leadership to contend with the dynamics of a 21st century Nigeria.

Having been privileged to preside over this great country, interacted with all categories of persons, dissected all shades of opinions, understudied different ethnic groupings; I can rightfully conclude that our strength lies in our diversity. But exploring and exploiting that diversity as a huge potential has remained a hard nut to crack, not because we have not made efforts, but building a consensus on any national issue often has to go through the incinerator of those diverse ethnic configurations. Opinions in Nigeria are not limited to the borders of the political elite; in fact, every Nigerian no matter how young or old, has an opinion on any national issue. And it is the function of discerning leadership to understand these elemental undercurrents in the discharge of state responsibilities.

WHERE WE ARE

There is no gainsaying the fact that Nigeria is at a major crossroads at this moment in its history; the choices we are going to make as a nation regarding the leadership question of this country and the vision for our political, economic and religious future will be largely determined by the nature or kind of change that we pursue, the kind of change that we need and the kind of change that we get. A lot depends on our roles both as followers and leaders in our political undertakings. As we proceed to find the right thesis that would resolve the leadership question, we must bear in mind a formula that could engender national development and the undiluted commitment of our leaders to a resurgence of the moral and ethical foundations that brought us to where we are as a pluralistic and multi-ethnic society.

Nigeria, before now, has been on the one hand our dear native land, where tribes and tongues may differ but in brotherhood we stand, and on the other hand a nation that continues to struggle with itself and in every way stumbling and willful in its quest to become a modern state, starting from the first republic till date. With our huge investments in the African emancipation movements and the various contributions that were made by our leadership to extricate South Africa from colonial grip, Nigeria became the giant of Africa during that period. But having gone through leadership failures, we no longer possess the sobriety to claim that status. And we all are guilty.

We have experimented with Parliamentary and Presidential systems of government amid military interregnum at various times of our national history. We have made some progress, but not good enough to situate us on the pedestal we so desirously crave for. It is little wonder therefore that we need to deliberately provoke systems and models that will put paid to this recycling leadership experimentation to embrace new generational leadership evolution with the essential attributes of responsive, responsible and proactive leadership configuration to confront the several challenges that we presently face.

In 2019 and beyond, we should come to a national consensus that we need new breed leadership with requisite capacity to manage our diversities and jump-start a process of launching the country on the super highway of technology-driven leadership in line with the dynamics of modern governance. It is short of saying enough of this analogue system. Let’s give way for digital leadership orientation with all the trappings of consultative, constructive, communicative, interactive and utility-driven approach where everyone has a role to play in the process of enthroning accountability and transparency in governance.

I am particularly enamored that Nigerians are becoming more and more conscious of their rights; and their ability to speak truth to power and interrogate those elected to represent them without fear of arrest and harassment. These are part of the ennobling principles of representative democracy. As citizens in a democracy, it is our civic responsibility to demand accountability and transparency. Our elected leaders owe us that simple but remarkable accountability creed. Whenever we criticize them, it is not that we do not like their guts; it is just that as stakeholders in the political economy of the country, we also carry certain responsibilities.

In the past few months also, I have taken time to reflect on a number of issues plaguing the country. I get frightened by their dimensions. I get worried by their colourations. I get perplexed by their gory themes. From Southern Kaduna to Taraba state, from Benue state to Rivers, from Edo state to Zamfara, it has been a theatre of blood with cake of crimson. In Dansadau in Zamfara state recently, North-West of Nigeria, over 200 souls were wasted for no justifiable reason. The pogrom in Benue state has left me wondering if truly this is the same country some of us fought to keep together. I am alarmed by the amount of blood-letting across the land. Nigeria is now being described as a land where blood flows like river, where tears have refused to dry up. Almost on a daily basis, we are both mourning and grieving, and often times left helpless by the sophistication of crimes. The Boko Haram challenge has remained unabated even though there has been commendable effort by government to maximally downgrade them. I will professionally advise that the battle be taken to the inner fortress of Sambisa Forest rather than responding to the insurgents’ ambushes from time to time.

THINKING ALOUD

In the fullness of our present realities, we need to cooperate with President Muhammadu Buhari to complete his term of office on May 29th, 2019 and collectively prepare the way for new generation leaders to assume the mantle of leadership of the country. While offering this advice, I speak as a stakeholder, former president, concerned Nigerian and a patriot who desires to see new paradigms in our shared commitment to get this country running. While saying this also, I do not intend to deny President Buhari his inalienable right to vote and be voted for, but there comes a time in the life of a nation, when personal ambition should not override national interest. This is the time for us to reinvent the wheel and tap into the resourcefulness of the younger generation, stimulate their entrepreneurial initiatives and provoke a conduce environment to grow national economy both at the micro and macro levels.

Contemporary leadership has to be proactive and not reactive. It must factor in citizens’ participation. Its language of discourse must be persuasive not agitated and abusive. It must give room for confidence building. It must build consensus and form aggregate opinion on any issue to reflect the wishes of the people across the country. It must gauge the mood of the country at every point in time in order to send the right message. It must share in their aspirations and give them cause to have confidence in the system. Modern leadership is not just about “fighting” corruption, it is about plugging the leakages and building systems that will militate against corruption. Accountability in leadership should flow from copious examples. It goes beyond mere sloganeering. My support for a new breed leadership derives from the understanding that it will show a marked departure from recycled leadership to creating new paradigms that will breathe fresh air into our present polluted leadership actuality.

My intervention in the governance process of Nigeria wasn’t an accident of history. Even as a military government, we had a clear-cut policy agenda on what we needed to achieve. We recruited some of the best brains and introduced policies that remain some of the best in our effort to re-engineer our polity and nation. We saw the future of Nigeria but lack of continuity in government and of policies killed some of our intentions and initiatives. Even though we did not provide answers to all the developmental challenges that confronted us as at that time, we were not short of taking decisions whenever the need arose.

GROWING INSECURITY ON OUR HANDS

The unchecked activities of the herdsmen have continued to raise doubt on the capacity of this government to handle with dispatch, security concerns that continue to threaten our dear nation; suicide bombings, kidnappings, armed banditry, ethnic clashes and other divisive tendencies. We need to bring different actors to the roundtable. Government must generate platform to interact and dialogue on the issues with a view to finding permanent solutions to the crises. The festering nature of this crisis is an inelegant testimony to the sharp divisions and polarizations that exist across the country. For example, this is not the first time herdsmen engage in pastoral nomadism but the anger in the land is suggestive of the absence of mutual love and togetherness that once defined our nationality. We must collectively rise up to the occasion and do something urgently to arrest this drift. If left unchecked, it portends danger to our collective existence as one nation bound by common destiny; and may snowball into another internecine warfare that would not be good for nation-building.

We have to reorient the minds of the herdsmen or gun-men to embrace ranching as a new and modern way to herd cattle. We also need to expand the capacity of the Nigeria Police, the Nigeria Army, the Navy and Air Force to provide the necessary security for all. We need to catch up with modern sophistication in crime detection and crime fighting. Due to the peculiarity of our country, we must begin community policing to close the gaps that presently exist in our policing system. We cannot continue to use old methods and expect new results. We just have to constructively engage the people from time to time through platforms that would help them ventilate their opinions and viewpoints.

THE CHANGE MANTRA

When the ruling party campaigned with the change mantra, I had thought they would devise new methods, provoke new initiatives and proffer new ways to addressing some of our developmental problems. By now, in line with her manifesto, one would have thought that the APC will give fillip to the idea of devolution of powers and tinker with processes that would strengthen and reform the various sectors of the economy. Like I did state in my previous statement late last year, devolution of power or restructuring is an idea whose time has come if we must be honest with ourselves. We need to critically address the issue and take informed positions based on the expectations of the people on how to make the union work better. Political parties should not exploit this as a decoy to woo voters because election time is here. We need to begin the process of restructuring both in the letter and spirit of it.

For example, I still cannot reconcile why my state government would not be allowed to fix the Minna-Suleja road, simply because it is called Federal Government road, or why state governments cannot run their own policing system to support the Federal Police. We are still experiencing huge infrastructural deficit across the country and one had thought the APC-led Federal Government would behave differently from their counterparts in previous administrations. I am hesitant to ask; where is the promised change?

LOOKING AHEAD

At this point of our national history, we must take some rather useful decisions that would lead to real development and promote peaceful co-existence among all the nationalities. We must be unanimous in what we desire for our country; new generation leadership, result-driven leadership, sound political foundation, demonetization of our politics, enhanced internal democracy, elimination of impunity in our politics, inclusiveness in decision-making, and promotion of citizens’ participation in our democratic process. The search for that new breed leadership must start now as we prepare for 2019 election.

I get worried when politicians visit to inform me about their aspirations and what you hear in terms of budgetary allocations for electoral contest does not cover voters’ education but very ridiculous sub-heads. A typical aspirant in Nigeria draws up budget to cover INEC, Police, Army and men and officers of the Civil Defense, instead of talking of voters’ education, mobilization and sensitization. Even where benchmarks are set for electoral expenditure, monitoring and compliance are always difficult to adhere to. We truly need to reform the political system. And we must deliberately get fresh hands involved for improved participation.

We need new ways and new approaches in our political order. We need a national rebirth. We need a rebranded Nigeria and rebranded politics. It is not so much for the people, but for the institutions that are put in place to promote our political engagements. We must strengthen the one man one vote mantra. It is often ridiculous for me when people use smaller countries in our West Africa sub-region as handy references of how democracy should be. It beggars our giant of Africa status.

The next election in 2019 therefore presents us a unique opportunity to reinvent the wheel and provoke fresh leadership that would immediately begin the process of healing the wounds in the land and ensuring that the wishes and aspirations of the people are realized in building and sustaining national cohesion and consensus. I pray the Almighty Allah grant us the gift of good life to witness that glorious dawn in 2019. Amen. I have not written an open letter to the President, I have just shared my thoughts with fellow compatriots on the need to enthrone younger blood into the mainstream of our political leadership starting from 2019.

 

We’ve broken the heart and soul of Boko Haram, says army

 

Rogers Nicholas, a Major-General in the Nigerian Army and Commander of ‘Operation Lafiya Dole’, the counter-terrorism operation in the North East, says Boko Haram has been defeated, as troops are now in complete control of the Sambisa Forest.

Nicholas said this while inaugurating a the Nigeria-Cameroon Military Joint Mission in Maiduguri, the Borno State capital.

According to him, troops taking part in Operation Deep Punch, which is aimed at flushing out the remnants of the terrorists, have Sambisa Forest, the stronghold of Boko Haram, in their grip.

“My soldiers are in the heart of Boko Haram enclave that is ‘Camp Zairo’, the gallant troops have taken total control of Sambisa Forest,” Nicholas said.

“We have broken the heart and soul of Shekau’s group, taking over the camp and its environs.They are on the run and we are pursuing them to wherever they go. This time around, there is no place for escape anywhere.

“We had earlier asked those of them that want to surrender to do so and we are still asking them to come out and surrender, otherwise they are going to meet it the hard way.”

On the formation of a joint military mission between Nigeria and Cameroon, Nicholas said it was to enable easy sharing of critical information and intelligence for better results.

“We share information and intelligence to enable us map out strategies to fight Boko Haram insurgents in our common borders,” he said.

The Nigerian army said they had started constructing an access road right in the Sambisa Forest as part of efforts to complete the dislodging of insurgents and make the vast area habitable.

“In its efforts to make Sambisa Forest habitable and also a training ground, the Nigerian Army is following up the ongoing clearance operations with road construction into main heartland of the forest and adjoining communities,” said Sani Usman, Director of Army Public Relations, in a recent statement.

“Already, work has commenced in earnest on Gwoza-Yamteke-Bitta road, as well as the reconstruction of the road from Gwoza-Yamteke-Bitta-Tokumbere, leading into Tokum forest.”

QUESTION: Why didn’t FG name the poly in Ekwueme’s hometown after him?

On Friday, the remains of Alex Ekwueme, former Vice President, were interred after a state burial ceremony attended by Vice President Yemi Osinbajo; and to immortalise the deceased elder statesman, he announced the Federal Government’s decision to rename the Federal University Ndufu-Alike, Ikwo( FUNAI) in Ebonyi State as Alex Ekwueme Federal University.

While the decision to etch Ekwueme’s name into the annals of history is quite laudable, many are questioning the rationale behind the choice of a university in faraway Ebonyi when there is a historic and fairly-prestigious federal tertiary education institution right in Oko, Ekwueme’s hometown.

BRIEF HISTORY

What is today known as the Federal Polytechnic Oko (FEDPOKO) was created by the Anambra State government in 1979 as a College of Arts and Science. Later in 1980, it was upgraded to a College of Arts, Science and Technology.

In 1985, it was promulgated a Polytechnic through an edict of the Anambra State Government, before it was eventually taken over by the Federal Government in 1993.

Part of the history of the institution as culled from its website read thus: “The kernel of what eventually became the polytechnic was the brainchild of the Oko Progressive Union (OPU) greatly catalyzed by the patronage, resourcefulness and result oriented leadership of its pioneer chairman, … Dr. Alex I. Ekwueme.”

Ekwueme’s integral role in the formation and transition of FEDPOKO is enough reason for the Nigerian Government to have considered renaming the institution after him.

WHY EBONYI UNI?

FUNAI was one of the 12 federal universities created by former President Goodluck Jonathan on February 26, 2011, a move believed by many to have been political.

While announcing the renaming of the university after Ekwueme, Osinabjo said it was to honour him for his contributions to national development.

By overlooking a popular federal institution in Oko, Ekwueme’s hometown, it is a wonder that FG has not lived by the age-long saying that a prophet is not without honour except in his own hometown.

Some say the perennial debate over which is more prestigious, between a university and a polytechnic, could be a factor in FG’s choice. Perhaps Ekwueme is too ‘mighty’ a figure to be named after a ‘mere’ polytechnic.

WHY NOW?

Going by the debates on social media over this recent announcement, Nigerians united in their thought that this honour to Ekwueme should have come when he was still alive to witness it.

A true Nigerian of Ekwueme’s calibre, they say, deserves to be honoured in his lifetime, not posthumously.

WILL HISTORY REPEAT ITSELF

Delivering his Democracy Day speech in 2012, former President Goodluck Jonathan announced the renaming of the University of Lagos after late M.K.O Abiola, acclaimed winner of the June 12 presidential election annulled by Ibrahim Babangida, then Military Head of State.

But instead of the euphoria such announcement was expected to generate, students of UNILAG, as well as prominent Yoruba leaders, vehemently protested it.

“We were all taken aback. There was no due consultation and they said this is a democracy,” Olukayode Amund, a Professor and Dean of Students Affairs of UNILAG, told reporters.

“Change of name is the least of our problems. Besides, there is MAPOLY, already named after Abiola,” a protesting student also told journalists.

Eventually, Jonathan was forced to beat a retreat and suspended the UNILAG name change.

A repeat of such protest is not envisaged this time round, given that Dave Umahi, Governor of Ebonyi State, has already issued a statement commending the President for the decision. However sound and genuine the intention may be, would it have been more fitting if the polytechnic at Oko was named after Ekwueme instead?