Home Blog Page 3192

Nigeria, History And The Clear And Present Danger

0

By Chido Onumah

These are perturbing times. On the eve of what promises to be Nigeria’s fiercest election, one that has set the country on edge, it is important that we sound alarm bells.

Even though we have seen it all before – whether we are talking about the 1964/65 elections (postponed for several weeks due to disagreements over the voters’ list) that precipitated the first military coup in January 1966 and the civil war the year after or the June 12, 1993 debacle and the Interim National Government (ING) contraption that followed – Nigeria today is in uncharted waters. We haven’t had an election this close with war raging in a part of the country.

The angst that followed the postponement, by the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, of the presidential election scheduled for this weekend is therefore understandable. The speech by Prof. Attahiru Jega, Chairman of INEC, announcing the postponement has been debated widely by Nigerians.

Clearly, there are many questions begging for answers. But if we focus on Jega, his pronouncements and the “politics” surrounding the postponement, we miss the forest for the trees. And here, I am not addressing the party faithfuls who can’t see the big picture even if it is as large as the 400-metre monolith called Aso Rock.

Even though I have strong reservations about elections holding on the new dates announced by INEC, I am inclined to give Prof. Jega and INEC the benefit of the doubt. I sincerely hope all eligible Nigerians get the opportunity to collect their Permanent Voters’ Card, PVC, and that the war on terror would have been won appreciably in the next six weeks to justify the postponement.

So, while we continue to prepare for the elections, patriots and active civil society – or what is left of it – should necessarily begin to interrogate why every election (and census, I must add) in Nigeria is a referendum on the continued existence of the country and why elections have literally become wars that the military would have to “supervise”.

It is for this reason that we must do a deep and sincere reflection on the current situation. If we do, we will, undoubtedly, arrive at the conclusion that more than anything else, we need a genuine national conversation about whether this country is sustainable the way it exists today.

President Jonathan was elected president in 2011 in a bloody election (postponed from January to April) that witnessed the death of hundreds of Nigerians, including patriotic youth who were serving their fatherland. He became president by default the year before following the death of his principal, Umaru Yar’Adua, who came to power in 2007 in one of the most farcical elections the country has witnessed.

President Yar’Adua, alongside then Vice President Goodluck Jonathan, was anointed by his predecessor, Olusegun Obasanjo, who was handpicked by the military, on the eve of their “departure” in 1999, to return the country to “civilian” rule.

It was the same Obasanjo, as an army general in 1979, who ushered in the country’s 2nd Republic which was led by President Shehu Shagari who was overthrown in 1983 by Gen. Muhammadu Buhari – who is currently running for president – in a coup that saw the country go through four military regimes in 16 years, the annulment by Gen. Ibrahim Babangida, of the June 12, 1993 election won by Moshood Abiola – who was murdered by the military regime of Gen. Abdulsalami Abubakar while in detention – and ultimately, the return of a retired general as president in 1999.

Clearly, our democracy so-called is nothing but “Army Arrangement”, apologies to Afrobeat maestro, Fela Anikulapo-Kuti. Then again, the question is, can we really blame our military? Looking at our history, is it out of place to say, as someone has noted, that Nigeria was rigged to fail?

Nigeria’s rapacious ruling class is salivating about the prospects of retaining power or coming to power. They have a right, going by our current constitution, to do so. What the ruling class – those in power now, those who have been in power and those who are seeking power, whether civilian or military – don’t have the right to do is to imperil the mass of our people.

Of course, I don’t expect the protagonists in this tragicomedy that Nigeria has become to appreciate much less work to mitigate the clear and present danger.

How then do we as a people break this vicious circle? It’s simple. Let genuine patriots, humanists, active civil society, if there is still anything so-called, stop worrying about which section of the ruling class will lose or benefit from the actions, inaction, greed and idiocy of Nigeria’s power blocs or what, for example, the current postponement has done or would do to our image in the comity of nations.

We have to forge a nation before we can compete or meet the standards set by the “international community”. The current crisis will fester and it is hard to predict the outcome. There is no other option but to confront this dilemma frontally.

conumah@hotmail.com; follow me on Twitter @conumah

PDP Has Confidence In INEC Chairman– Adamu Mu’azu

0

The Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, has said that it has confidence in the chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, Attahiru Jega, thereby denouncing the statement made by the party’s presidential campaign spokesperson, Femi Fani-Kayode, who earlier implied that the party had lost confidence in the electoral umpire.

Chairman of the PDP, Adamu Mu’azu, told reporters at a media briefing on Thursday that it so far has no reason to question the credibility of the INEC chairman.

Femi Fani – Kayode had complained about what he said was a deliberate attempt by INEC to favour the opposition through the distribution of more Permanent Voter Cards, PVCs in the north than other parts of the country.

Fani – Kayode also accused Jega of holding secret meetings with chieftains of the All Progressives Congress, APC to perfect how to manipulate the election for the opposition party.

“Pieces of information at our disposal have shown that Jega has had meetings with APC stalwarts in Dubai and other cities in the world to perfect this wanton conspiracy against 23 million eligible voters.  Besides, we have information that the PVCs that Nigerians are scrambling for are not in Nigeria and will not arrive before the elections. These PVCs are still in China and Prof Jega has strategically delayed their arrival to suit his electioneering permutations,” he alleged.

However, the PDP chairman saw things differently, saying that the party believes that Jega and his team in INEC would conduct free and fair election in March.

“You asked if the party has confidence in Jega. My answer is not far-fetched,” Mu’azu said, adding that President Goodluck Jonathan also support INEC.

“The President stated during his media chat last night (Wednesday) that he has confidence in Jega…We also have confidence in Jega and that he and his team will conduct free, fair and transparent elections,” the PDP chairman stated.

The reason given by Jega for the postponement of the elections, however, did not sit well with Mu’azu, who said the commission only capitalised on the security situation in the northeast to mask its non-preparedness.

“Although we tend to agree with INEC on the security reasons given for the postponement, we are nevertheless not unmindful of the fact that the commission on its own part was not fully prepared for the February 14 election date,” Mu’azu said

He noted: “Taking the INEC chairman, Jega, on his own words, for the 68.8 million registered voters, the commission had only printed and delivered 66.3 million Permanent Voter Cards with 1.3 million yet to be delivered and 1.1 million stolen cards yet to be replaced.


READ ALSO:


“Also according to Jega, 45.09 million voters cards were collected by prospective voters, representing 65.8 per cent of the registered voters and 23.71 million PVCs, representing 34.2 per cent, were yet to be collected as at February 7, which is exactly one week to the February 14 earlier scheduled date. Compare this anomaly with the 2011 elections where not a single eligible voter was disenfranchised.”

Mu’azu, therefore concluded that INEC “could not sincerely claim to have been fully prepared for a desirable credible, free and fair election at the time when more than 23 million registered voters were going to be disenfranchised.”

 

Transparency International Wants Global Action Against Money Laundering

0

By Samuel Malik, Abuja

Transparency International, TI, the global organisation leading the fight against corruption, has called on governments around the world to synergise in order to effectively combat money laundering, which has plagued many countries, particularly  the developing world.

According to TI, despite abundant evidence, most investigations into money laundering have usually resulted in plea bargains and fines, thereby encouraging more of the illicit transactions.

According to Jose Ugaz, chairman of Transparency International’s board of directors, there is usually evidence of money laundered “but for the greatest part investigations have only resulted in corporate fines with almost no criminal prosecutions of individuals. Actions by national judicial authorities to end this criminal behaviour are largely absent.”

Ugaz believes that the lack of senior management accountability “sends a signal to the corrupt individuals and corporations laundering cash, and to their banks, lawyers and other agents who assist them in their crimes, that in this area there is impunity”, adding that “this is wrong.”

Transparency International’s call for more action on money laundering is coming on the heels of several reports that have put Nigeria, among other countries, in the spotlight regarding money laundering and corruption.

Nigeria is reportedly responsible for 60 per cent of the money that Africa lost to capital over the last decade, with $60 billion leaving the continent annually, according Illicit Financial Flow report adopted by the African Union.

Transparency International said those who engage in money laundering use intermediaries like bankers, accountants, real estate brokers, consultants and other professionals, who encourage and profit from it by concealing identities of criminals.

“Approximately 100,000 individuals and corporations held accounts at the Swiss branch of Europe’s largest bank, HSBC and investigations by the media have found many to allegedly conceal funds for tax evasion and others to harbour the alleged proceeds of corruption.”

“UBS, one of the two largest banks in Switzerland, confirmed on February 10 that it is being investigated by US authorities into whether it helped Americans evade taxes,” TI said.

Instead of fines and plea bargains, the watchdog said stringent sanctions such as prison time is crucial in discouraging the act, as fines can only embolden perpetrators.

“Time behind bars for those who break the law, rather than settlements that shift the burden to shareholders, would signal a time to change,” Ugaz said.

He equally observed that ending money laundering requires the cooperation of the financial sector, especially banks, noting that secrecy laws make them attractive to those interested in the crime..

“Recent investigations in the US, UK and Switzerland in bank practices have put a spotlight on these issues,” TI said, adding that, “Banks need to oversee their employees and enforce higher ethical standards, which have to be reflected in the tone from the top, the performance management system and remuneration.

 

 

Legal Aid Group Demands Voting Rights For Prisoners

0

By Abiose Adelaja Adams

The Legal Defence and Assistance Project, LEDAP, a non -governmental organization, NGO, has expressed optimism that the postponement of the general election will give room to the courts to deal with its pending lawsuit against the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, regarding prisoners’ right to vote before the new election date of March 28.

The suit with file number FHC/ABJ/CS/157/2013, was first filed in March 7, 2013 at the Federal High Court, Abuja, in defence of a certain Godwin Pius, a Nigerian death row prisoner at the Federal Prison Ibara, Abeokuta.

The plaintiff prayed the court to issue an order compelling INEC to register the names of all prisoners in Nigeria in the voters’ register and set up voting units in all prisons and detention centres, provide polling centres and facilities to enable them vote in 2015 and in all subsequent elections in the country.

“Prisoners have the right to vote, as enshrined in the 1999 Nigerian Constitution and the Electoral Act; but INEC has denied them of that right in all elections conducted in Nigeria,” Obiagwu said in an interview with the www.icirnigeria.org.

He argued that failure of INEC to register the names of all voters constitutes a violation of their rights because electoral body has the statutory duty and obligation to ensure registration of the names of all qualified voters (including approximately 60,000 prison inmates) in Nigeria in the voters’ register, set up voting units and provide facilities to enable registered voters to participate in elections.

“They might have been incarcerated in prison but they are still citizens of Nigeria above 18 years, and so have the right to vote under Section 12 (1) of the Electoral Act 2010 (as amended),” the lawyer and activist stated.

INEC on February 6, 2014 had prayed the court to strike out the suit arguing that it was incompetent on the grounds that Pius, the death row prisoner, had no locus standi to institute proceedings in a court of law, given that he had been stripped of his right to personal liberty by virtue of being a prisoner on death row in a secluded prison under a 24-hour watch.

Obiagwu however, argued that there is no provision of law in Nigeria, including the Prisons Act and regional or international treaty to which the country is a signatory that excludes prisoners’ right to vote.

“The combined reading of  Section 14(2) (c) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), Section 12 (1) of the Electoral Act (as amended), and Article 13 of the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights Act 1990 shows that the right to vote by any Nigerian who has attained age of 18 is guaranteed. This right is not removed by fact of imprisonment of the citizen.”

Obiagwu’s major argument is that  the policies and laws made by the elected leaders and government affect the daily lives and rights of prisoners but they are excluded from the process of electing such people.

“The Nigerian prison system is beset with well-known and fairly well-documented problems including high awaiting trial population occasioning congestion, poor sanitary and health facilities, decaying infrastructure.”

Jail breaks has also become common due to the aforementioned, he noted.

In his analysis, elected governments in the past have shown no commitment to reforming the laws regulating Nigeria’s prisons. The current Prisons Act was enacted in November 1947 (68 years ago), and is yet to undergo any fundamental reform since.

Also, a draft prisons bill presented to the National Assembly in 2004 is yet to be passed into law.

According to the Nigeria Prisons Service website, there are 239 prisons nationwide with a capacity for 49,505 inmates. As at June 30, 2014, there were 56,785 inmates in Nigerian prisons, out of which a huge 68 per cent are awaiting trial, while only 32 per cent have been convicted.

According to Obiagwu, the problems with the criminal justice system and conditions of the prison, have been acknowledged by the Nigerian government and in many attempts at reform, the federal government has set up panels such as National Working Group on Prison Reform and Decongestion in 2005, Presidential Committee on Prison Reform and Rehabilitation in 2006 and Presidential Commission on the Reform of Administration of Justice 2006.

These panels submitted reports recommending far reaching prison reforms to the government.

‘Unfortunately, past government in Nigeria have shown apathy towards implementing reports of panels it created,” Obiagwu lamented.

The last hearing of the case was in October 2014, but case was adjourned because of the absence of the plaintiff’s counsel in court. However, the case could also not be heard on the adjournment date because the courts were on strike.

The activist lawyer expressed the hope that with the six weeks postponement of the election, the court will take another look at the case.

“With this postponement now, we can proceed with it and even if it doesn’t meet this election, we would have won the case for subsequent elections in Nigeria,”

 

2015 Election: Group Warns Against Foreign Interference

0

A civil society group, Citizens Initiative for Security Awareness, CISA, has cautioned Nigerians on the need to be wary of the antics of some hostile foreign powers currently masquerading as friends on the issue of 2015 general elections.

The group gave the warning at a press conference convened by another group, I-Nigerian Initiative, in Abuja while reacting to international response to the postponement of the general elections in Nigeria.

Expressing disappointment at the postponement of the polls after much mobilization by its members and political parties, the group observed, however, that “the six weeks is not six months, more so we have received continuous assurances from both the NSA and President Jonathan that the May 29 date for inauguration of a new Government is sacrosanct.”

The national coordinator of the group, Chidi Omeje, affirmed his confidence in the motives of the National Security Adviser, NSA, and the defence chiefs concerning the issue, stating that “we believe, without equivocation, that the intervention and position of the National Security Adviser and the relevant security agencies on this issue was guided by altruism and the larger interest of the nation and not in any way for partisan considerations”.

Cautioning Nigerians to be wary of insincere advice from those who had predicted the disintegration of the country, he drew attention to the fact that when the federal government approached certain western powers to purchase necessary armaments needed for fighting the Boko Haram insurgents, the nations had bluntly refused and that they had even gone further to “veto decisions by other friendly countries to sell weapons to us, citing some vague claims of human right abuse by our troops”.

Omeje said that the decision was “to frustrate our efforts and to denigrate our sovereignty” while insisting that patriotic Nigerians must never be silent in the face of supremacist interference in the nation’s affairs by the “Western interlopers who turned in time of great distress but are now quick to grandstand and pontificate over our election dates.”

He noted that the present momentum in the counter-terrorist operation spearheaded by a reinvigorated Multi National Joint Task Force, MNJTF, involving Nigerian military and her counterparts from Chad, Cameroun and Niger Republic was yielding positive results.

“It was based on this imperative that the military is of the opinion that providing full support to the electoral process at the moment will greatly affect the terms, spirit and tempo of the new collaboration.  The belief is that between now and the coming weeks will be very crucial in the renewed fight against terror by the reinvigorated Multi National Joint Task Force which Nigeria is coordinating and that any distraction or diversion at this critical moment will be counter-productive as we move to reverse the situation in the northeast,” Omeje said.

Speaking further on rumours of collusion between the military and politicians, Omeje stated that contrary to insinuations being bandied about on social network platforms and in the traditional media by some politicians, the position of the military is definitely in the larger interest of the national security and not for any political expediency or ulterior consideration.

“We therefore advise fellow Nigerians to insulate the military from partisan politics and rather have confidence in its neutrality and sense of patriotism.”

The CISA coordinator, who also spoke on INEC’s readiness to conduct elections, observed that with Nigerians anticipating an election that will not only be free and fair but which must also be credible, it would be counter-productive to conduct the said elections in a situation whereby close to 30 per cent of potential voters had not collected their permanent voters’ cards, PVCs.

“INEC Chairman, Professor Attahiru Jega was also quoted to have admitted that if given more time, the commission would do a better job; this is in recognition or admission of apparent non-readiness of the commission, he noted.

Omeje also observed that “Card readers were still being imported while ad-hoc staff were yet to be trained for an election that was just seven days away” and queried, “Will it not have been a monumental embarrassment for INEC if it had gone ahead to conduct the elections with such level of preparation?”

He also expressed appreciation to the Nigerian armed forces which he said, apart from its primary constitutional role of defending the country from external aggression and internal insurrection also shouldered the responsibility of providing support in aid of civil authority in times of national security emergencies such as providing complementary security arrangement to protect the electoral process.

 

United Nations Demands End To Use Of Child Soldiers In Conflict

From Afghanistan to the Democratic Republic of the Congo, DRC, as the world’s conflicts become more brutal, intense and widespread, children are finding themselves increasingly vulnerable to recruitment and deployment by armed groups, the United Nations warned today.

In a joint press release marking the International Day Against the Use of Child Soldiers, observed every February 12 since 2002, the UN Children’s Fund, UNICEF, and the Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflict called for “urgent action to end grave violations against children” and appealed to all parties of conflicts to meet their obligations under International Law.

“While governments of the world have made progress to recognize children have no place in their armies, the recruitment of child soldiers is still a huge problem, especially with armed groups,” said Leila Zerrougui, the Special Representative for Children and Armed Conflict.

“Out of 59 parties to conflicts identified by the UN Secretary-General for grave violations against children, 57 are named because they are recruiting and using child soldiers,” she added.

According to the UN, tens of thousands of boys and girls are associated with armed forces and armed groups in conflicts in over 20 countries around the world. In Afghanistan, for instance, children continue to be recruited into national security forces and, in some extreme cases, used as suicide bombers.

Meanwhile, in the territories of Iraq and Syria controlled by the Islamic State, ISIS, children as young as 12 are undergoing military training and being used to carry out suicide bombings and executions.

At the same time, a number of conflicts in Africa have witnessed a rise in the use of children for military purposes. In the Central African Republic, where sectarian violence continues to ripple across the country, boys and girls as young as eight years old have been recruited and used by all parties to the conflict.

According to the press release, the Democratic Republic of Congo, DRC, has witnessed a similar phenomenon in child soldier recruitment with boys being dispatched into conflict while girls are reportedly commissioned as sex slaves.

In South Sudan, some child soldiers have been fighting for up to four years and many have never attended school. In the last year alone, 12,000 children, mostly boys, have been recruited and used as soldiers by armed forces and groups in South Sudan as a whole.


READ ALSO:


“The release of all children from armed groups must take place without delay. We cannot wait for peace to help children caught in the midst of war,” said UNICEF Deputy Executive Director, Yoka Brandt.

“Investing in ways to keep children away from the frontlines, including through education and economic support, is absolutely critical to their future and the future of their societies.”

 

 

David Mark Denies Spearheading Election Postponement

0

Senate President David Mark has refuted an allegation by Babafemi Ojodu, an All Progressive Congress, APC, member of the Senate, that he was the first person to call for postponement of this year’s elections.

Ojudu said that Mark made the call last year on the floor of the Senate

Expressing his dismay, the Senate President said in a statement that he never called for the delay of the polls and would never do such.

“I have neither canvassed the postponement or deferment of 2015 election nor has my body language ever suggested that. I am shocked that distinguished Senator Ojudu could descend to this level of mischief and blackmail for reasons that I am yet to understand,” the statement read.

Cautioning Ojodu, Mark said notwithstanding their political affiliations, there is need for politicians to maintain restraint for the sake of peace and unity”


READ ALSO:


The Senate President recalled: “when the issue of insurgency came to the floor of the Senate and a distinguished senator introduced the issue of election I had cautioned that the issue before the Senate had nothing to do with election and that the issue before us in the Senate was insurgency and terrorism.”

In September 2014, it was reported in the media that the Senate President had called for the postponement of elections on the floor of the Senate, something he immediately denied through a media statement issued by Paul Mumeh, his media aide.

 

Gunmen Attack Edo Oil Firm, Kill Two Workers

0

By Jefferson Ibiwale, Benin 

Unknown gunmen on Tuesday stormed Okomu Oil Palm Plc. and attacked seven workers, killing two and injuring five, in a spate of attacks that have left the company apprehensive.

Located at Udo village in Ovia South West local government area of Edo State, Okomu Oil Palm has come under attacks in recent time from angry Ijaw youths, who feel angered at the company’s refusal to ‘settle’ them.

Our source said the miscreants also set ablaze a significant area of the plantation before escaping from the scene.

The source also said some workers had been attacked before but the management kept mute. He also said Tuesday’s incident took place not far from a security base.

“This matter does not concern us. We are just workers but the Ijaw boys always attack us and leave the management staff alone.

The spokesman of the company, Ikponmwosa Osunbor, confirmed the killings and said the hoodlums have been warning the oil firm to leave the land, even though they have not made any demand for money, but rather throwing leaflets into firm asking them to leave.

“They have burnt 300 hectares of matured rubber and oil palms,” Osunbor said, calling on government to detail more security to the plantation, “Government should provide more security for us. Our fear is that it will not turn into a tribal war.”

 

 

APC Accuses Jonathan Government of Intimidating Opposition Leaders

0

By Adedayo Ogunleye, Abuja

The All Progressives Congress, APC, has accused the ruling Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, – led Goodluck Jonathan government of deliberate attempts to harass and intimidate opposition figures, especially in the run-up to the general elections now scheduled for March 2015.

The party’s national publicity secretary, Lai Mohammed, in press statement issued Thursday in Lagos, stated that the recent military siege on the Lagos residence of the APC national leader, Bola Tinubu, the Imo State Government House residence of Governor Rochas Okorocha, and the subsequent siege by mobile policemen on the residence of APC’s presidential campaign spokesman, Garba Shehu, in Abuja, all fit into a pattern of harassment and intimidation to which the party has been calling the public’s attention.

It also said that key national leaders of the party have been placed under surveillance by security agents.

”As the elections approach, we know the harassment and intimidation will be stepped up. We know our leaders, including the National Chairman Chief John Oyegun, National Leader Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, Gov. Rotimi Amaechi, former Gov. Timipre Sylva, Senator Bukola Saraki and National Publicity Secretary Alhaji Lai Mohammed, are under surveillance and their phones being hacked,” the APC alleged.

The party stated further: ”We are aware that several of them, especially the National Publicity Secretary, have been marked down for arrest in the days to come. We know there are evil plots to frame some of them on trumped-up charges. We know our lives are in danger. But these and more will not deter us from continuing to act in the national interest or from seeking to effect change through the ballot box.”

Thanking Nigerians for their unwavering support since the elections were re-scheduled for March, the party noted that the postponement was specifically aimed at dampening the enthusiasm of those who had embraced the message of change, and urged supporters of the APC not to relent.

”We are glad that instead of weakening the resolve and enthusiasm of Nigerians, the Presidency-orchestrated postponement has further galvanized them to be more determined not only to vote but also to defend their votes,” it stated.

The APC called on Nigerians to demand and insist “that the elections be held as rescheduled, that there will be no interim government or tenure elongation”, stating also that Nigerians have the power to forge change with their voter’s cards.

Calling on President Jonathan to “remember the verdict of history and put his dogs of war on a leash”, the party said that the president should realize that history will judge no one but him even for the actions of his supporters, who are all acting in his name.

Tinubu had raised an alarm on Monday that armed soldiers had besieged his Lagos residence over the weekend, stating that “no act of intimidation from the Federal Government can cause him to back down in his struggle for change in Nigeria”.

PM News reported that the soldiers were first noticed on Sunday, a few minutes to 11 pm in an army truck. They were stationed about 500 metres away from Tinubu’s gate.

“The stern looking soldiers were around for hours on Sunday and returned on Monday to continue their surveillance. Monday night about 10.45pm, they returned to the residence in two army vans and were there throughout the night, the newspaper reported.

Shehu on Thursday also reported sighting heavily armed mobile policemen amassing around in residence in Garki, Abuja.

 

Why APC Is A Better Choice

0

By Godwin Onyeacholem

With many years of uncertainties as the hallmark of her wobbly existence, Nigeria has once again arrived at a critical juncture – that inevitable episode in the life of a nation when it is summoned to deploy the courage to take crucial decisions for good or for bad, depending on the resolve of the people.

And, as history has shown, the tougher the decision taken the higher the chances of avoiding a lurking calamity.

That unique circumstance has presented itself in the 2015 election, where Nigerians will do well to seize the moment and take the decision that will hopefully alter the nation’s trajectory towards a more meaningful purpose. It cannot be overemphasised that never in the history of the country has an election generated so much interest, anxiety and fear of violence. This is due to its zero-sum character as a result of the high stakes embedded in it.

One thing is clear in this poll: between the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the opposition All Progressives Congress (APC), whoever is victorious wins everything, and whoever suffers defeat loses everything.

And what are the issues in this much-talked-about election? Certainly human rights is not one of them. Therefore, the human rights record of the APC standard bearer Mohammadu Buhari under a military dictatorship is irrelevant here.

Though the past of any individual or nation cannot be completely ignored, such pasts must be anchored on facts, not shameless distortion of facts for political expediency as in the case of the noxious documentary on Buhari being aired by a TV station.

In any case, Nigerians seem to have overwhelmingly resolved that this election is not about human rights, but about Nigeria of the present and what the future holds for her. Therefore, the focus of the campaign has naturally been on three key issues of the day: corruption, unemployment and insecurity.

To say that corruption has been identified at various times by both local and foreign experts as the bane of Nigeria’s development is to overstate the obvious. At independence in 1960, Nigeria was put on the same path of advancement with countries like South Korea and Brazil for instance, but today these countries, through focused leadership, have left Nigeria far behind and gone far ahead in terms of development that is almost equal, if not at par, with that of USA and western European countries.

Instead of showing statesmanship by preparing the grounds for a solid developmental take-off, the conservative ruling class which inherited power from the colonial masters chose to evince an inept leadership whose chief tool of governance was corruption.

Sadly enough, successive governments (civilian or military) have not deviated from that ignoble path. So much so that the ruling PDP in the last six years has taken corruption a notch higher by imbuing it with crass impunity.

Under the PDP-led Goodluck Jonathan administration, which no doubt has its root in the discredited colonial inheritors, government accountability has taken flight. Money gets missing at will. Subsidy on petrol suddenly rose from N300m to N2.6trn. Jonathan promised the nation in 2012 after the House of Reps probe on fuel subsidy that all those involved in the massive swindle would be made to account for it. But nothing has happened to them up till now. They still walk free, and some of them are still seen hobnobbing with top government functionaries including Jonathan himself.

Many more scandals were to follow. For blowing the whistle on a missing $20bn that the NNPC – which routinely funnels money into PDP projects – was supposed to have deposited into a federal government account, former governor of Central Bank of Nigeria and now Emir of Kano, Sanusi Lamido, was fired.

Only recently, a report of the Price Water House Cooper forensic audit of the NNPC elicited by Sanusi’s allegation was submitted to Jonathan. It recommended that NNPC should refund $1.48bn to the federal government purse.

On Jonathan’s watch, the former Minister of Aviation, Stella Oduah, forced some agencies under her ministry to buy for her two BMW bulletproof cars at the cost of about N250m. Instead of handing her over to EFCC for prompt prosecution, Jonathan beat around the bush for a long time before reluctantly sacking her in a cabinet reshuffle. Today, the woman is contesting a senate seat under a PDP ticket.

On her part, Minister of Petroleum Resources, Diezani Alison-Madueke, spent a whopping N10 billion of taxpayers’ money to hire private jet to satisfy her extravagant ego, yet nothing has happened to her.

When a committee in the House of reps attempted to question her, she quickly rushed to the court to block the probe. Yet government agencies under her ministry are known to be veritable conduit pipes for siphoning state funds. The size of corruption in the petroleum sector alone is so enormous as to cause some concerned citizens, including former top staff, to call for the scrapping of NNPC.

Today Nigeria loses about 400,000 barrels daily to oil thieves who operate in the Niger Delta area. Rather than empower the Nigerian Navy to secure the oil pipelines crisscrossing the delta, government handed the job over to ex-militants who alongside their sponsors are benefitting from the theft.

That massive stealing of public funds is going on under this PDP government is stale news. Clearly, Jonathan’s government has no appetite to fight corruption. He has demonstrated it by not only telling the world that stealing is not corruption, but also by going ahead to embrace a man who is still being tried for money laundering and make him the head of media and publicity of his presidential campaign organisation.

As one former President put it in a local dialect, there is no better way to literally describe the way Jonathan is handling governance than this: “I can do whatever pleases me…..nobody can arrest me.”

Still, the inability of this government to deal decisively with corruption invariably negatively rubs off on the economy. Government officials keep churning out all sorts of statistics to buttress their view of a growing economy, but the reality on ground points to the contrary. Now with the crash in oil price in the international market, government is telling the people to brace up for some austerity measures.

An already flattened people will now have to pay for government’s profligacy, poor policy planning and acute incompetence.

In 2011 Jonathan made specific promises but none has so far been fulfilled. Surely, there are more people out of jobs today than four years ago when Jonathan was first elected. The poverty level is higher today than it was four years ago. More people now go to bed with just one meal per day and Nigerians are definitely poorer today than they were four years ago. Four years ago $1 was sold for between N155 to N158. Today it is not less than N210 and more likely to keep going up.

In January 2013 at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Jonathan told CNN’s Christine Amanpour that by the end of 2013, steady electricity would be available to Nigerians.

Today, Amanpour would be shocked to learn that Nigerians still enjoy no more than six hours of electricity, if it comes at all. This is even after selling off the assets of the Power Holding Company of Nigeria to PDP sympathisers in the name of privatisation.

It remains an eternal embarrassment that Nigeria remains the only oil producing country that imports refined petroleum products. Successive PDP governments, propelled by corrupt inclinations, refused to build additional refineries to boost the nation’s refining capacity. Nor would they focus on diversifying the economy towards agriculture and mineral resources especially as oil is a wasting asset.

Instead, they chose to revel on the gravy train supplied by the petroleum sector, appropriating the numerous oil wealth for themselves and their friends alone.

However, most distressing is the inability to rein in growing insecurity in the land. Nigerians never heard of insurgency perpetrated by a perverse group called Boko Haram, or kidnapping of any sort by some misguided youth angling for quick money until the PDP years.  And under this government, these problems have become worse with bands of kidnappers operating mostly in the southern part of the country, and Boko Haram posing a clear threat to the existence of Nigeria as a nation.

 

As of today, on Jonathan’s watch, the group controls no less than 25 local governments, a territory about the size of Belgium, in the north-eastern part of the country.

Without doubt, this government has run out of ideas on how to tackle these insurgents. Instead of leading from the front and taking on the country’s enemies head-on, Jonathan and his party spent much of the time labelling the APC, accusing the party of being the sponsor of Boko Haram.

By the time they stopped making excuses, Boko Haram had kidnapped hundreds, maimed many, killed more than 13,000 Nigerians and carved out swathes upon swathes from the Nigerian territory which they have declared an Islamic caliphate.

Section 14 of the 1999 Constitution as amended says the primary objective of government is the security and welfare of its citizens. But from the way the current PDP government is carrying on, it has failed woefully in this regard. Therefore, Nigerians will be better served if they reject a government that cannot protect them and provide for their welfare.

That is the reason the 2015 election is crucial. Having seen that the PDP cannot take this nation out of the woods into which its governments keep pushing it, Nigerians through this election must take a bold decision to substitute this government for the one with far greater potential to improve their lot.

With its seemingly left-leaning orientation, the APC government will certainly do more for the people within a short time than the PDP claimed to have done in 16 years. Coming with a package of social security benefits that will greatly encourage primary school enrolment as well as significantly address the plight of the unemployed in the society, there is no doubt that the APC deserves to be given a chance to prove its mettle.

As for corruption and insecurity, Nigerians can be rest assured that they will be well secured under a Buhari government. His government will make concrete efforts at plugging the sources of leakage; it will not be caught shielding a confirmed rogue; it will not be found pussyfooting on insecurity. Instead, it will take the battle to the enemies of Nigeria, wherever they are.

Godwin Onyeacholem is a journalist based in Abuja. He can be reached on gonyeacholem@gmail.com