CLEEN Foundation launches platform to digitise court judgements— 3mins read
We need your support to produce excellent journalism at all times.
THE CLEEN Foundation, a non-governmental organisation promoting public safety and access to justice, has launched an online platform that enables the digitisation of and public access to court judgements, known as Uwazi.
The launch took place on Tuesday at a one-day capacity building workshop for stakeholders held in Abuja.
Funded by the MacArthur Foundation, Uwazi was designed by the Human Rights Information and Documentation Systems (HURIDOCS), a data-based human rights organisation.
Benson Olugbuo, the NGO’s executive director, in his opening remarks read by Ruth Olofin, the programme manager, noted that CLEEN Foundation has worked with the justice sector since its establishment in 1998.
He said the broader goal of the new initiative, tagged Promoting Accountability and Transparency in the Criminal Justice System, is to end corruption, ensure effective justice delivery, and improve the country’s criminal justice system. It is also expected to promote accountability and transparency in the fight against corruption.
“It will be recalled that before the 2019 general election, we collaborated with the Nigerian Police Force and other security agencies to train security officials deployed for election duties.
In addition, during the general election, we deployed technology to monitor the activities of security agents under our Election Security Management Project. We were able to report to Nigerians real-time development from the field,” Olugbuo said.
Believing that technology is the way to go in solving some of Nigeria’s problems, he said Uwazi boasts of functionalities that include search, filter, tracking of documents, cross-referencing, and the viewing and downloading of court rulings within the reach of the public.
“It is important to note that the concept of digitisation of court cases is not new,” the executive director said.
“It is being practised in Nigeria and other countries. For instance, electronic legal documentation has been firmly established and stable in Austria since 1999. And in the United States, digitising court proceedings and electronic online case files have been the standard in their federal courts in over a decade.”
Olofin said CLEEN Foundation has two data collectors in each of eight states: Abuja, Anambra, Ekiti, Enugu, Kaduna, Lagos, Ondo, and Oyo; but is on the lookout for more personnel and volunteers. The data collectors observe court proceedings, especially ones related to corruption, get a copy of the judgement, and then upload on the platform.
“We are bringing an angle to the project where the public, legal practitioners, and scholars can go online and access the court cases that we have uploaded on the platform,” she explained. “As we speak now, we have about 262 cases on the Uwazi platform, including those on corruption and financial crime.”
She said the foundation plans to establish resource centres where people can get hard copies of the documents that have been uploaded on the platform, especially for those without internet access. The first of such centres will be launched in Oyo State in June.
In a hands-on technical session, Gabriel Akinremi, a senior IT officer at CLEEN Foundation, took the participants through a step-by-step process of tracking and uploading cases on the platform. In response to a question from The ICIR, he said lawyers and members of the public interested in collecting data for the platform are welcome to apply with CLEEN Foundation.
Also in attendance at the launch were Tolulope Agunloye, a project manager with BudgIT who spoke on how ICT may be applied in fighting corruption; Amina Salihu, Senior Programme Officer at MacArthur Foundation; as well as representatives from the Ministry of Justice, Federal High Court, and Nigeria Police.
Going through the Uwazi platform, The ICIR observed that as of the time of writing there are 137 cases on the website related to financial crimes, 106 related to corruption, 15 related to accountability, and 62 “other related cases”. Also, 234 cases have been decided, 18 are subsisting, and six are pending.
The majority of these cases (70) were decided or are ongoing in the Federal Capital Territory, closely followed by Anambra with 47 cases and Enugu with 46.
Some of the documents scanned and uploaded, through the use of Optical Character Recognition (OCR), can be easily copied if previewed; but this is not the case for all the uploads. For the latter category, the words in the court judgements are displayed as part of search results.
Currently, the platform does not allow users to upload documents on court proceedings or provide additional information about uploads.
Though there are filters according to court type, case type, case status, state, and originator of the document, it is difficult for users to narrow the search results to specific judges, accused persons, prosecuting agency, length of the case, and so on.