Home Blog Page 2478

‘N20 trillion’ stamp duty scandal: FIRS, CBN, OSGF, others refuse to disclose details of recovery

DETAIL of the revenues from stamp duties estimated at N20 trillion still remains opaque as the federal agencies involved in the collection have refused to provide information, despite the  Freedom of Information (FOI) request filed by The ICIR.

The FOI request was sent on July 31 on behalf of LeaksNG to the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (OSGF), Nigerian Postal Service (NIPOST), and the Nigeria Inter-Bank Settlement System (NIBSS) PLC.

Information requested for include a report of stamp duty remittances by Deposit Money Banks and other financial institutions, the current status of the Stamp Duty Central Account domiciled in the CBN, stamp duty revenue remitted to the CBN by NIBSS between 2016 and 2017, amount of revenue collected by NIPOST between 2010 and 2016 and so on.

Two months after the requests were despatched, on September 26, letters of reminder were again sent to the various offices to draw their attention to the enquiry. Nevertheless, till the time of this report, none of the institutions has fulfilled its legal obligations by providing the information asked for.

While NIPOST and NIBSS have not bothered to respond at all to the FOI request, others gave one excuse or the other for their inability to oblige.

Different reasons, same conclusion

Of all the five agencies that received enquiries from The ICIR, three responded, but sidestepped the responsibility to disclose information. The OSGF, in its reply dated August 9, 2018, said it had referred the FOI application to the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), which according to it is better positioned to provide answers.

“After a careful review of the application,” wrote J.O. Obule, Acting Legal Adviser to the Secretary, “the Office is of the view that the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) has a greater interest and is the custodian of the information sought and therefore would be in a better position to provide same.”

“Please be informed that your application has been referred to the FIRS accordingly and you are advised to deal with it directly,” he added.

FIRS would later shift responsibility to Nigerian Postal Service, NIPOST.

In a letter dated November 5 and signed by Ike Odume, the FIRS Director of Legal Services, the FIRS wrote:

“The Legal Service Department of the FIRS received a letter from the International Centre for Investigative Reporting dated 26th September 2018 requesting for details for Stamp Duties recovered from NIPOST. We regret to inform you that FIRS does not collect Stamp Duties from NIPOST.

“Therefore we ask that the above request be directed to NIPOST.”

NIPOST is yet to respond to similar enquiries sent to them.

Finally, the Central Bank of Nigeria replied to The ICIR‘s request on November 6 and, in the letter signed by R.J. Monguno of the Corporate Secretariat, said it cannot provide the information sought as the matter is the subject “of a suit before the Supreme Court of Nigeria and is therefore subjudice”.

The court action referenced in this letter is yet unclear.

Secrecy, alleged fraud mar Nigeria’s potential gold mine

The status of unremitted revenue from stamp duties said to have run into several trillions of naira over the years, has been shrouded in secrecy.

In November 2017, the Senate kick-started a probe into the allegation that stamp duties revenue which accumulated over a period of five years and is valued at over N20 trillion has not been paid into the federation account.

Following a motion raised by John Owan Enoh, the senator representing Cross River Central district, the House had instructed committees on finance and banking, insurance and other financial institutions to investigate the scandal and report back to it within a period of eight weeks.

“The Senate is worried that the provision for stamp duty in the revenue framework of the nation’s annual budget for 2015, 2016 and 2017 has been N8.7 billion, N66 billion and 16.9 billion respectively despite the above reports; apprised of the anti-stamp duties collection stance of the Nigerian Inter-Bank Settlement System,” Enoh said.

“It is currently being accused of systemic diversion of huge revenue flows from stamp duties collection on the electronic transfer receipt on online bank transactions, and the necessity to demand notice on all unremitted stamp duties.

“The Senate is convinced of the duties and responsibilities of the National Assembly to ensure the harnessing of all sources of revenue to the government of the federation, and to curb all forms of wastefulness, corruption and diversion of funds belonging to the federation.”

The School of Banking Honours (SBH) is the consultancy agent authorised in October 2017 by the federal government, alongside the International Investment Law and Arbitration, to recover stamp duty revenue that has not been remitted.

It raised alarm in March that the NIBSS has been uncooperative so far in SBH’s efforts to recover unremitted stamp duty revenue of about $53.3 billion (N19.4 trillion) borne out of inter-bank electronic transactions.

According to Tola Adekoya, SBH’s Project Consultant and Chief Executive Officer, N7.719 trillion was due in 2015 as accumulated yet unremitted revenue to the federal and state governments of Nigeria. In total, he said, the funds are about N20 trillion, out of which not up to one per cent has been remitted appropriately.

He also said the presidency, through the office of the secretary to the government, has ordered the CBN to cooperate with SBH in implementing its mandate. However, NIBSS has refused on multiple occasions to grant access to data of relevant inter-bank transactions that passed through its central switch.

“We served the demand notice because NIBSS is the agent of banks that handles their transactions,” Adekoya said.

“Banks don’t have any power over NIBSS, once they ascertain a liability, they debit the banks immediately and that is why NIBSS is going to be a strategic partner in recovering the unremitted stamp duty revenue. It was indicated in the first paragraph of the letter sent to CBN and NIBSS that we should commence with NIBSS and that is what we are doing. We are following due process.”

According to its website, the NIBSS “was incorporated in 1993 and is owned by all licensed banks including the CBN.” It manages inter-bank payments so as to remove bottlenecks characteristic of fund transfers and operates the Nigeria Automated Clearing System (NACS).

The NIBSS board “is composed of the Deputy Governor (Operations) of the Central Bank of Nigeria as the Chairman, representatives of Banks as Directors, Executive Directors and the Managing Director/CEO, who heads Executive Management group of the organisation”.

The House of Representatives Committee on Telecommunications, in October 2017, summoned Kemi Adeosun, the former finance minister, Godwin Emefiele, governor of the CBN, and Adebisi Adegbuyi, post-master general of NIPOST, to provide explanations on why billions generated from stamp duty charges were kept in commercial banks and the CBN.

The committee’s resolution was triggered by the revelations by Zhigun Shaba Usman, who is NIPOST’s Director of Finance and Investment, who said the sum of N13.4 billion had been deposited to the CBN by commercial banks.

Usman had, however, added that the figure is suspect as the banks’ remittances oddly increased geometrically after NIPOST announced plans to audit the accounts.

FIRS, NIPOST fight for relevance in managing revenue

The controversy as to who is responsible for what and the fate of revenue generated so far has been on for years. In February 2016, the Revenue Mobilisation, Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) had to wade in to strike an agreement between the competing forces on access to a revenue account estimated to attract over N2.5 trillion annually.

Moreover, in which authority the control of stamp duty funds resides has also been a contentious matter, especially between the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) and the Nigeria Postal Services (NIPOST). While FIRS has claimed stamp duties collection as part of its statutory functions, NIPOST appears to disagree.

Ike Odume, FIRS’s Director Legal Services, has described a controversial bill to amend provisions of the Stamp Duties Act as an attempt to usurp its duties. According to him, the Act as it exists is a tax legislation which has nothing to do with NIPOST.

The postmaster-general of the federation, however, said, in his submission, that the amendment is crucial because the law has become old-fashioned and that NIPOST is only requesting for permission to sell stamps, either manually or electronically.

“We are seeking the amendment of the Act to include the sale of a postage stamp. We are not collecting the tax. It is in the interest of Nigeria to draw a line between duty and stamp. We want to sell our stamp,” Adegbuyi said.

Between December 2016 and January 2017, NIPOST put out adverts for forensic auditors to peruse bank records in an attempt to confirm the compliance level of banks when it comes to remittances. But, as gathered by  Punch, the postal service had to ditch its plan after the CBN said it could use its supervisory powers to achieve similar results.

NIBSS denies responsibility for stamp duty revenue

Samuel Oluyemi, NIBSS’ Deputy General Manager of Corporate Services, in an interview with  TheCable has said, despite claims to the contrary by the SBH, the NIBSS is not attempting to prevent the federal government from realising the full potentials of the Stamp Duties Act.

This is because the company is neither in possession of any revenue accruing from stamp duties nor is aware of how much been collected under the scheme. NIBSS jurisdiction does not cover anything having to do with stamps or cheques, he said.

He also revealed that there is no mechanism presently in place to track how much each bank is collecting and that banks charge the duty at their own discretion as not even all of them make the necessary deductions.

He recommended that the enabling act for the collection of stamp duty is reviewed to specify what should be collected.
Governors’ Forum declines to comment

When he was contacted by The ICIR, Abulrazaque Bello-Barkindo, who is the Media and Public Affairs Head at the Nigerian Governors’ Forum Secretariat, insisted the forum cannot comment on the subject “at the moment because the case is subjudice”. He declined to shed light on what the litigation is about or who the parties are.

“There is post office interest, there is governors’ interest, so we are not talking about it until the case is adjudicated on,” he explained.

He was also asked whether a report has been submitted by the three-man committee established by the NGF, in April, and headed by Ibikunle Amosun, governor of Ogun state, which was mandated to investigate the allegations of non-remittance. No, they have not, he replied.

“As a matter of fact, there has not been any meeting regarding that up till now. The governor has been very busy, and we have not had it on the agenda for the last four, five meetings.”

The committee had been given one week to submit its findings to the forum. NGF’s concern regarding the unexplained non-remittance of the bulk of the duty arises as a result of the percentage guaranteed to flow to the thirty-six states.

With the current sharing formula, while the federal government takes the lion’s share of 52.68 per cent from the federation account, the state governments collectively get 26.72 per cent and the country’s 774 local governments get 20.6 per cent.

Adebisi Adegbuyi, Postmaster-General of NIPOST, did not answer calls from The ICIR and has not responded to texts asking, among other questions, if the postal office still intends conducting an independent audit of bank records.

Did PDP presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar hand out food with N500 notes at his first election rally?

LAURETTA Onochie, a media aide to Nigerian President Muhammadu Buhari has claimed that PDP presidential candidate Atiku Abubakar, distributed cash and food at his Sokoto rally held on Monday, December 3.

CrosscheckNigeria, a collaboration of newsrooms in Nigeria which includes The ICIR  has investigated this claim and found it to be FALSE.

Onochie tweeted an image supposedly from the Sokoto campaign rally. While the tweet has garnered multiple retweets, we have found the image to be recycled and mis-contextualised.

Also, one Facebook user, named Zara Gift Onyinye who described herself as former Manager at On Time Groundlink Limited, a subsidiary of Exotic Car Hire & Tourism posted the same picture and tagged it “This is how it happened in Sokoto today…Shameless to say the least”. The post has since garnered over 2,000 shares at the time of this report. Onochie and Onyinye are active on social media and known for spreading misinformation, The ICIR check has revealed.

Using Google Reversed Image Search, we found that the photograph circulated by Ms. Onochie first appeared online in February 2017 when a Lagos-based Charity foundation, released photos from an outreach.

The same image was re-used to publicise Ruth Eze, a Nollywood actor’s orphanage visit, two days later in February 2017.

We, therefore, submit that the image does not support the claim that the PDP presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar, induced voters with cash or gift at the kick-off of his presidential campaign in Sokoto.

Israeli spyware ‘Pegasus’ alleged of facilitating Khashoggi’s murder

NSO, an Israeli spyware company, one of Israel’s biggest cybersecurity companies, with a staff of 600, has been ensnared in controversy after allegations that its Pegasus smartphone-snooping technology had allegedly been used by some governments to spy on dissidents and journalists including Omar Abudulaziz a Saudi dissident and a friend of the murdered Washington Post Journalist Jamal Khashoggi.

Unlike companies whose technology protects customers against cyber attack,  NSO is a weapons firm that doesn’t deal with data security. It sells offensive software and spyware to governments and law enforcement and espionage agencies.

The Canadian human rights organization Citizens Lab says NSO has sold its platform to 45 countries, including Saudi Arabia.

Founded in 2009 by Niv Carmi, Shalev Hulio and Omri Lavie, NSO is notorious for its involvement in the use of Pegasus to track and hack companies, nations, activists, and journalists with the latest being the phone hacking of Omar Abudulaziz.

Over 400 Whatsaap messages exchanged between the late journalist and Omar was read by the Saudi government, including their plan to start an online youth revolution against the oppressive government ran by the kingdom Crown Prince Mohammad Bin Salam (MBS)

Omar Abdulaziz believes Saudi authorities intercepted private messages between him and Jamal Khashoggi. (Photo Credit: CNN)

Edward Snowden, former U.S. intelligence worker said that NSO technology was used to help track dissident Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi who was killed at the Saudi consulate in Istanbul in October.

Citizen Lab reported hat NSO’s Pegasus spyware had been installed on the phone of Abdulaziz, just as the latter claimed that his phone was being monitored at the time.

However,  the firm said that the spyware is a lifeline rather than an invader of privacy.  “On a daily basis, NSO assists in saving the lives of thousands of people from the hands of terrorists, drug barons, child-abductors, paedophiles and others,” it said.

Research has shown that Pegasus makes it possible to carry out nearly limitless surveillance of individuals, including taking control of cell phones. Its capabilities include collecting information about a phone’s location, wiretapping into it, recording conversations taking place near a phone and photographing those in the vicinity of the phone.

Other instances NSO Spyware Pegasus was used for illegal spy activities.

Ahmed Mansoor Targeted With iPhone Zero-Day

Ahmed Mansoor is an internationally recognized human rights defender, blogger, and member of Human Rights Watch’s advisory committee.  Mansoor, who is based in the UAE, was jailed for eight months in 2011 along with four other activists for supporting a pro-democracy petition.

On the morning of August 10, 2016, Mansoor received an SMS text message that appeared suspicious. The next day he received a second, similar text. The messages promised “new secrets” about detainees tortured in UAE prisons, and contained a hyperlink to an unfamiliar website.

Mansoor quickly forwarded the messages to Citizen Lab researchers for investigation.

Every year since 2011, Mansoor has been targeted with spyware attacks, including with FinFisher spyware in 2011 and Hacking Team spyware in 2012.

Mexican Soda Tax Supporters Targeted with NSO Exploit Links

In response to the political pressure against the soda tax, in mid-2016 public health groups and food scientists prepared a mass media campaign to build support for the tax, increase the tax rate, and call for accountability in how the tax revenue was being spent.

Campaigners held a press conference on June 29, 2016, highlighting misleading and confusing product labelling standards promoted by the food and beverage industry and planned a full launch of their campaign in August 2016.

Campaigners began receiving the spyware links one week after the press conference, and throughout the period that the campaign was being prepared

The same infrastructure used for the Bitter Sweet operation was also used to target a Mexican journalist who wrote a story about government corruption involving the Mexican President’s wife and a high-speed rail contractor, among other domestic targeting.

Senior Mexican Legislators and Politicians Targeted with NSO Spyware

On Monday, June 19, 2017, Citizen Lab published results of an investigation that revealed that 12 individuals in Mexico and the United States were sent at least 76 text messages in an attempt to infect them with government-exclusive spyware called Pegasus. The targets included prominent journalists, lawyers, and a minor child.

Investigation Into Mexican Mass Disappearance Targeted with NSO Spyware

This research note reveals that an international group of experts investigating the 2014 Iguala Mass Disappearance of 43 Mexican students were targeted with Pegasus, the government-exclusive commercial spyware made by NSO Group.

Lawyers for Murdered Mexican Women’s Families Targeted with NSO Spyware

Karla Micheel Salas and David Peña are Mexican lawyers and human rights defenders who have worked on a series of high profile cases. Notably, they represent the families of Nadia Vera, Yesenia Quiroz Alfaro, and Mile Virginia Martin who were slain alongside journalist Rubén Espinosa and Alejandra Negrete in the so-called Narvarte killings. In addition to this case, Salas and Peña are well known for their work on women’s rights.

On September 25 and October 15, 2015, Peña received text messages containing infection attempts with NSO’s Pegasus spyware. The messages were designed to trick him into clicking on the links. Once clicked, the links would infect Peña’s phone. The first message referenced an organization Peña belongs to, the second masqueraded as a “service message”

On October 1, 2015, Salas received a message purporting to inform her of a death and inviting her to awake.

The message contained a link to (smsmensaje[.]mx,) the same domain used to target Peña

NSO Group Infrastructure Linked to Targeting of Amnesty International and Saudi Dissident

Amnesty International reports that one of their researchers, as well as a Saudi activist based abroad, received suspicious SMS and WhatsApp messages in June 2018. Amnesty International researchers have concluded that the messages appeared to attempt to infect these phones with NSO Group’s Pegasus spyware.

 

SEX-FOR-MARK: How HOD harassed, attempted to rape us –Ebonyi Poly students

By Mojeed Alabi

DESPITE the outcry by some female students of Akanu Ibiam Federal Polytechnic, Unwanna, Afikpo in Ebonyi State that they are being sexually harassed by their HOD, the Rector is casual in his approach to taking action on the matter.

Barely two weeks after the dismissed Professor of Management and Accounting at the Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU), Ile-Ife, Richard Akindele, was arraigned and remanded in prison following alleged sexual harassment of one of his students, Ms.Monica Osagie, two female students of Akanu Ibiam Federal Polytechnic, Unwanna, Afikpo in Ebonyi State, have cried out for help over alleged sexual harassment and intimidation against them by one of their lecturers. The two Higher National Diploma (HND II) students – Oko Janet Osinachi and Egwu Gladys, said the institution’s Head of Department of Marketing (HOD), School of Business Studies, Ezumah Chris Obi, had invited them to hotels at different times, with the intent to sleep with them before he would pass them in his courses and their final year projects, which he was the supervisor. But, the lecturer has denied the allegation, saying the students chose to meet him at the hotels and that nothing close to their allegations ever happened. Rector of the polytechnic, Venerable Ibe-Enwo Ogbonnia, confirmed the development, but claimed he was yet to receive formal complaints from the students, and hence he could not have acted without such.

Narrating her ordeal, 22-year-old Janet explained that her trouble started when she secured admission into the HND programme in the polytechnic in 2017 through Direct Entry, and she needed to register at the Department.

She said: “I had my ND at the Federal College of Agriculture, Ishiagu in Abakalaiki. When I resumed to the Unwana Polytechnic and I went to the Department for registration, I was directed to see the HOD in the office, and after necessary courtesies, he asked for my number which I gave.

“Ever since then, he kept calling me but I was always avoiding him. I was shocked when I checked my result in the course he took us in the Second Semester in HND I, which was Distribution and Management Logistics, and I failed the course. But, I didn’t go to him to complain, so I repeated the course this year.”

When it was time for Project Writing Course in First Semester of HND II, Janet said the HOD grouped her among those he would supervise, apparently to again make room for close contact. She further narrated: “Like my other colleagues, I suggested my project topic, but the HOD cancelled it. I went with another one the second time; he still cancelled it. He then advised me to write on my file that I was requesting him to help me with a project topic. And, I did just that.

When I took my file with the request to him, the HOD then told me that he would speak with me on phone. So, later that evening, on March 21, 2018, he called me on phone and said I should see him at P-Noble Hotel in Afikpo, some kilometres away from Unwana. Even though I was shocked, I summoned courage and went.

“When I got there, he asked me where I was coming from. I lied to him that I was coming from home and that I live with my parents. I said I was cooking for my mother that day. I lied so that he would know that my mother would be waiting for me to finish the cooking. Then, while still there he sent the topic to me on my phone, which is; ‘Impact and Challenges of Self-Promotional-Based Strategies on Brands and Stores Patronages in Urban Areas’.

“He then told me that I failed his course in First Semester and I said yes. He said I caused it and that if I had complied I would not have failed. I said I was sorry. He said as the HOD he has the power to make the decision either to let me graduate or not. He said he was giving me the last chance and that if I failed to give him chance this time, he would treat me like a stubborn fly. That was the exact statement he made. I said okay sir. Then he told me that there was a burial ceremony he wanted me to accompany him to at Ohofia in Abia State the following day. I told him it would be difficult because I didn’t know what my mother would say. Then I lied to him that my mother was calling me and so I had to go.

“The following day, I sent him a message that I could not make it because my mother did not agree that I should go. He did not reply the message.”

According to Janet, on another day, the lecturer called her around 10am to see him at another place called Maria Island Resort, which is said to belong to a popular American returnee in the community, Maria Nwachi nee Egwu, who is also known as“Afikpo Chic.”

On getting to the resort, she said she was directed upstairs to the compound and that as soon as she entered the room, she saw the HOD sitting on a chair. She added: “Before setting out to meet him, I told my elder sister who kept monitoring me. She initially said I should not go because we already got to know that the HOD was living at the resort.

At that stage I didn’t want to involve my parents because I thought it was something I could handle by playing him and that he would forget it. So, he asked me to sit and I sat on the bed but near the door. He started to discuss with me, lit his cigarette and started smoking. On my failure to attend the burial ceremony with him, he said I was a bush girl and that why should I have told my mother that I would be accompanying a male lecturer to a party? He said why didn’t I lie to my parents. And, at point I replied I didn’t remember to lie. He said even if he was my mother would he have allowed me?

“Thereafter, he demanded for what I had written and I gave the file to him. He looked through and dropped on the bed. Then, he stood up and was moving close to me, so I stood up and started begging him to forgive him. Then he requested for my phone and that he wanted to delete his number from my phone. I think he thought I was recording him but when I gave him the phone he did not see anything recorded and dropped my phone on the bed. He held my hand and I began to cry and knelt down.

“He asked me to stand and started telling me how much he loved me and how he would make sure I become the envy of everyone in the school. I then told him I was engaged to my fiancé and told him his name – Ekenna Okeke, a non-academic staffer, who works in Administrative Section. He was angry and said the guy is a boy to him and that how could I ever thought of ending up with such a man that has nothing to offer me. I told him the guy had been trying for me since and that I don’t want to disappoint him. He then said even if anything should happen, the guy would not know anything. I said no, and that I could not lie to the guy.

“Then because I told my elder sister before coming, she started calling me and I said my mother was calling me. He then said I should touch him and I said no. Then he held me very tight and said I should not open my mouth. As soon as I wanted to cry out, he said everything was over and deleted his contact on my phone. He said I should never disturb him again and that henceforth, he would start treating me like an enemy.” Janet said since then the HOD had refused to check her project and that whenever she go to him for correction he would shout on her and chased him out of his office.

However, through the help of other lecturers, she was able to complete the work without the approval of the supervisor. Meanwhile, on November 6 and 7 when the external supervisors visited the department to assess the graduating students’ projects, the HOD refused to present Janet for the exercise.

Earlier, Gladys, who had noticed that Janet was also not making any meaningful progress in her project work, approached her to find out why. But, while sharing their experiences, they duo discovered that they had similar problem -suffering the consequences of rejecting the HOD’s advances. According to Gladys, her own trouble had started during her National Diploma days in 2013, when the lecturer approached her to date him.

“He collected my GSM number and was always calling on phone. One weekend he called me and said I should come and spend the weekend with him. He said did I know who was speaking and he introduced himself, and said I should be prepared to come to wherever he was to spend the weekend with him but I refused. So, since then he didn’t disturb me again. She said they never had anything together until she returned for her HND programme in 2017.

She explained: “When I returned for my HND and he was already the HOD, he told me if I remembered that we had an unfinished business and that he believe that I am already mature enough now. Then he collected my number and each time he called he would ask me to meet him in his apartment and I would say okay, but I would not go.

“So, when we were grouped for project supervision, I found myself in his group and then came another round of troubles. While attending to others he would always chase me out of his office.

“When I discussed with one of my lecturers I was advised to honour his invitation so that we could even know what he wanted. So, sometimes in September this year, I went to him at the Maria Island Resort. As soon as I sat down, he wanted to grab me, I stood up and said I was not well.”

Meanwhile, when the HOD refused to present the duo for Project Defence between November 6 and7, they came together and began to cry profusely. While crying, some of the lecturers advised them to take the matter up.

Janet recalled: “Those lecturers, who I wouldn’t want to mention their names, advised me that if I have anybody to run to I should do so on time, and that without that, the man would deal with me as he had vowed. So, I had to call my elder sister, Mrs. Ada Chioma, a businesswoman, who graduated from the school. She came around and in the process the Deputy Rector (Academics), Elder Ibiam, got to know and told me to make it official. I even sent a text message to the Rector immediately but he is yet to reply.”

Gladys also explained that her elder brother, Mr. Ogbonna Egwu soon learnt of the development and called the HOD and that the lecturer became incoherent on phone.

“He told my brother that I paid my school fees late and that was why he didn’t allow me to defend my project. But my brother said I was one of the first to pay fees because he was the one that paid for me,” 26-year-old Gladys said.

A yet to be identified caller had also taken the matter up during a phone-in programme on an Enugu-based Dream FM Radio Station, and the development had compelled the institution’s management to commissioned three lecturers to quickly assess the two students’ projects and graded them without the external supervisors. Following the deputy rector’s advice, both Janet and Gladys also submitted written petitions dated November 7, to the management of the institution through the Offices of the Dean, School of Business Studies and the Dean of the Students’ Affairs. Meanwhile, when New Telegraph spoke on phone with the HOD on Friday evening, November 30, he said he was not comfortable discussing the matter at the time because he was at a conference, but denied the allegation.

He said: “My reaction is that I don’t think they are correct. They said they didn’t defend their project or what? Well, like I said before, I don’t think such thing was the problem.

Such thing never happened. “Did I invite her to a hotel or she sought to see me on her own? I think I am not really comfortable to discuss that right now because I am at a conference. I said I am not comfortable to talk now, I am at a conference. So you can call me on Tuesday.”

Meanwhile, more than three weeks after the petition was submitted by the students, the Rector on Saturday, December 1, told New Telegraph he was yet to receive any complaint on the matter, saying people only called him on phone to draw his attention to the issue and that he could not just react on mere rumour.

The Rector said: “About three weeks ago, and precisely on November 9 when I was leaving Afikpo to lead the Polytechnic Bursar to World Accountants Conference in Sydney, Australia, I received a call that something like that was happening and I said I would be coming back the next day and that when I come back I would know what to do. “But, as I was coming back and I was at Owerri, heading back to Afikpo, I received another call that there was a radio programme discussing the same matter.

However, I must say that we have laid down procedures in the polytechnic. If a female student claims she has been sexually harassed or otherwise, she should first of all complain to the HOD, but if the HOD is involved she should complain to the Dean of School, and Director of Academics and then the Deputy Rector (Academics). If there is a formal complaint, it would form the basis for us to take action.

“If she doesn’t want that channel, she can go to the Dean of Students’ Affairs and put her petition down in writing and from that channel it would get to me for further necessary action.

“As we speak, it is over three weeks now and I have not got any formal complaints about it. I could not have just reacted to what is on social media and begin to investigate. So, I won’t say I have not heard about it, but not formally. I did not listen to the phone-in programme on the radio but people who listened to it told me.”

Meanwhile, when confronted with the fact that Janet had on the same day sent a text message to the Rector to complain and followed it up with an official petition, the Rector was silent. He, therefore, promised to attend to the issue as soon as he receives a copy of the petition. Thus our reporter was propelled to forward a copy of the three-page petition to the Rector via his WhatsApp platform, which he had already confirmed receipt. He has, however, not given our reporter any feedback. The Rector’s perceived nonchalance on the matter, it was learnt, might have confirmed some lecturers’ position, alleging the management is incapable of looking into the case because HOD is a relation of the wife of the Rector.

Some of the lecturers, who craved anonymity, confirmed the promiscuity of the HOD, who they said hailed from Arochukwu community in Abia State.

“His family members are settled abroad and he lives very recklessly here in Nigeria. Many students have suffered in silence under him, and he has given bad name to the polytechnic. But, who dare talk? He is untouchable,” one of the lecturers said.

This report was first published by the New Telegraph Newspaper. The ICIR has the permission to republish.

ASUU strike: Stop threatening us with no-work, no-pay rule, NLC warns FG

THE leadership of Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) has warned the Federal Government to stop threatening striking workers with no-work, no-pay rule as a means of getting the workers to abandon the strike.

The Congress was reacting to a directive by the Federal Government through the National Universities Commission (NUC) to implement the no-work, no-payment rule against the members of Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) who have been on strike since November 5, 2018.

The ICIR reported that  the Federal Government in a  letter dated November 29, 2018, signed by Ramon Yusuf, the NUC Director of Research, Innovation and Information Technology and addressed to Vice Chancellors of Federal Universities and Directors of Inter-University Centre, directed management of the universities to pay the salaries and allowances of only non-teaching staff.

The lecturers vowed that they would not return to the classrooms except the government implemented the Memorandum of Action (MoA) it signed with the union in 2017.

But NLC in a statement issued on Tuesday by its Acting President, Lawal Dutsinma demanded an immediate release of workers’ salaries withheld on the account of “No Work… No Pay” rule.

“We warn government at all levels to desist from using the “No Work… No Pay” rule to shirk away from their responsibilities,”Dutsinma said.

“Our children have suffered enough already! Enough is enough,” he added.

He said the government should respect agreements it freely entered into with ASUU in order to restore normalcy and sanity to public institutions of learning especially, universities.

While noting that the Federal Government might have rescinded the order, NLC said Nigerian workers were worried that the Federal Government and many state governments have resorted to bullying and draconian threats in dealing with matters that strictly reside in the domain of industrial relations.

“This is truly sad, highly unfortunate and extremely provoking,” Dustinma said.

He lamented that the no-work, no payment threat issued by the government against ASUU members was not the first time the government was taking such autocratic decision to cow workers into silence.

“During the last warning strike by the NLC on the new national minimum wage, the Minister of Labour and Productivity, Dr Chris Ngige issued a “No Work… No Pay” threat against workers.

“Also, during the last nationwide strike action by health workers, the Federal Government did not only issue a “No Work… No Pay” threat, it went ahead to implement it. Till now, the government still withholds about three months of salaries due to health workers,” he recalled,

The Congress described the application of the “No Work… No Pay” rule as an autocratic attempt to cow workers into abandoning their legitimate demand for decent wages, conducive workspaces and social justice.

“As far as we are concerned, the government’s invocation of the ‘no work, no pay” clause in the Trade Disputes Act is selective, erroneous and hypocritical,” he said.

Workers, Dutsinma noted stand the higher moral ground to invoke a “No Pay… No Work” action, given the fact that the Federal Government and many state governments are owing varying arrears of salaries, allowances, pension and gratuity.

He emphasized that Nigerian workers will never accept slavery in their own country noting that the right to strike is both a human and trade union right protected by laws and international conventions particularly ILO Convention 87.

“It is the right to strike that distinguishes a worker from a slave. Do we need to remind the government at all levels that Nigerian workers are worthy partners in nation building and not slaves?”

National Assembly workers protest over unpaid salaries

0

STAFF of the National Assembly are currently protesting in Abuja, the Federal Capital Territory to demand payment of unpaid wages and promotion due to their members.

The protesting workers, under the umbrella of Parliamentary Staff Association of Nigeria (PASAN) in their hundreds, gathered at the lobby of the National Assembly demanding the management to address their grievances.

They carried placards with various inscriptions, as they threatened to scuttle plenary sessions of both the houses of Senate and Representatives.

When the Deputy Senate President, Senator Ike Ekweremadu, arrived at the Assembly, he was prevented from gaining entrance into the legislative chambers.

Members of the association had last week during their congress resolved to picket the premises of the federal legislature from Tuesday to Thursday to press their demands on the Consolidated Legislative Salary Structure (CONLESS).

PASAN, released a statement after its Congress that the Senate President Bukola Saraki and Speaker Yakubu Dogara, in line with their statutory mandate, should take urgent steps to nominate members from the National Assembly Service Commission (NASC).

They said all pending staff promotions and conversion letters should be released with their arrears duly paid, while the 2018 promotion eligibility list be released as well as the results of the promotion exams conducted on or before December 31 this year.

“After due deliberations on the above crucial issues, Congress resolved that in view of management’s apparent continued disregard and unwillingness to address all the above listed issues, the union ‎in compliance with the laws of industrial dispute is hereby demanding the full implementation of the above listed grievances by management within the next two weeks from today.

“Failure to implement the above resolutions on the deadline, which is 13 December 2018, the union will have no option than to embark on an indefinite strike action from the 14th December 2018,” the statement read.

Senators and members of the House of Representatives were booed as they arrived for sitting.
The shout of “No alert, no sitting, no alert no sitting” filled the hall as the aggrieved workers denied the lawmakers entry into the chambers.
Senators Adamu Aliero, Ahmed Babba Kaita, Kabiru Marafa and Ibrahim Gobir were prevented from entering the chambers, while members of the House of Representatives that were prevented from entry included Ahmed Idris and Yunus Ustaz Abubakar.

FLASHBACK: Atiku appoints ‘serial plagiarist’ as SA on Public Communications

IN a press statement released in Abuja, on Sunday, by Paul Ibe, Media Adviser to Atiku Abubakar, the Peoples Democratic Party’s presidential candidate announced his appointment of four new aides. One of them, Phrank Shaibu, The ICIR recalls, was at the centre of a plagiarism scandal six years ago.

Shaibu, a public communications consultant and former Special adviser to Kogi State governor, Ibrahim Idris, on Public Communication and Strategy, was appointed by Atiku as Special Assistant on Public Communications.

The other newly appointed aides included Ahmed Adamu, Aliyu Bin Abbas, and Funmi Lamuye, who were respectively appointed as Special Assistant on Youth and Strategy, Special Assistant on Youth Support Groups, and Special Assistant (South-West).

In 2012, Farooq Kperogi, an Associate Professor of Journalism and Emerging Media at Kennesaw State University and author of “Politics of Grammar”, a weekly column in the Daily Trust newspaper, tagged Shaibu as a “shameless, serial plagiarist” of his grammar column. He alleged that he had been “willfully and barefacedly plagiarizing” his grammar column for months on Facebook, ChannelsTV, and Radio Kogi.

Kperogi’s account

In his article published on September 23, 2012, Kperogi narrated that he had, by chance, gained access to a closed Facebook group created by Shaibu with over 1000 members, which he titled “Mind Your Grammar”. His membership request, triggered by his conversation months earlier with one of the members, was approved on September 13 by Abdul Mahmud, a lawyer and one of the group administrators.

According to the journalism lecturer, while on the group, he discovered Shaibu “copied entire passages—sometimes whole articles— word for word” from his grammar column, put them on the group and equally took credit for the intellectual properties — some members addressing him for instance as a “professor of English”.


READ ALSO:

He wrote: “Once I became a member of the group, I voraciously read the postings on the group’s page and found that every single contribution that Phrank Shaibu made to the group was plagiarized from my grammar column. His responses to questions from group members were lifted from my articles, sometimes even when the responses were irrelevant to the questions asked. And he was praised to high heavens by his admirers, most of whom were young girls.”

After reporting his observation to other members of the group, Kperogi said he was kicked out from the platform and blocked on Facebook by Shaibu. Mahmud received a similar treatment when he posted on his wall to intimate his friends of his findings. The Facebook group was also deleted shortly after the allegation was made public.

“Phrank called me a week ago and admitted to his plagiarism, apologized profusely (I recorded all his phone conversations with me, which I will tender in court), promised to pay me compensatory damages, and to issue a public apology for his infractions,” Kperogi said. “But he shamelessly reneged on all his promises. Instead, he kept playing childish pranks on me. The man, certainly, is not contrite.”

In a second article published a week after, the US-based professor provided screenshots and quotes of excerpts of his work plagiarised by Shaibu on the deleted group, adding also links to his column publications from which they were copied.

That the paragraphs uploaded were copied from his column without acknowledgement, and with only occasional minimal changes in word choice, has been confirmed by The ICIR.

Kperogi: The above screenshot was was plagiarized from my September 2, 2012 article titled “The English Nigerian Children Speak.”
Kperogi: The screenshot above is plagiarized from my article titled “Top Cutest and Strangest Nigerian English Idioms” first published on June 20, 2010 in the People’s Daily and on my blog. It was republished in my Sunday Trust “Politics of Grammar” column on June 19, 2011.
Kperogi: The above screenshot was plagiarized from my April 22, 2012 article titled, “Q and A on Idioms, Nigerian Expressions, and Punctuations.”

In an interview he granted in May 2013, Kperogi said his intention to charge Shaibu to court was stalled because he could not get the latter’s fixed address to which a letter could be delivered. “My lawyer called him directly to ask for his address and he refused to give it,” he disclosed. “People who know him closely told us he has no fixed address.”

Shaibu: Allegations are just unguided remarks, half-truths

In his three-paragraph response published on September 25, 2012, Shaibu said he would not be provoked by the allegations, which he described as “unkind comments”, “unguided remarks”, “unbridled insults” and “half-truths”.

“Already, l have consulted many knowledgeable persons on the issue of the purported plagiarism and their views show a sharp contrast with the wild assumptions of ‘Prof’ Farooq,” he said.

“Any logical mind would easily appreciate that from the contents of Farooq’s unbridled insults, it is obvious that his grudge against me is not on the issue of alleged plagiarism. l have also discussed with my lawyers and their position is that l should not waste tons of newsprint in creating unnecessary relevance for Farooq given that it is most appropriate to meet him in court in line with his expressed desire to sue.”

He further alleged that the allegations were merely antics by Kperogi to draw readership to his column and blog, and said he would rather focus his attention on purposeful engagements to advance humanity. “For emphasis. most of the remarks by Farooq about me are shocking and nothing but figments of his skewed imagination,” he added.

 

Both parties contacted… six years after

Six years after the scandal first broke out, The ICIR made moves to get updates from both individuals. Kperogi, in response to an e-mail sent to him on Monday, said he could not proceed with his legal action because his lawyer could not locate Shaibu and the suit would have required his physical presence in Nigeria, which wasn’t a convenient option.

He also clarified why some of the screenshots he uploaded appeared to have been captured from a Facebook group called “Kogi Political Forum” and not “Mind Your Grammar”. He explained that he had in error erased screenshots he personally took of the plagiarised materials from his computer not knowing the group would be deleted.

“Fortunately, he also shared the plagiarized materials on the ‘Kogi Political Forum’ Facebook group,” he said.

“Fans of my grammar column who first called my attention to his serial plagiarism of my articles on his ‘Mind Your Grammar’ Facebook group also pointed me to his posts on the “Kogi Political Forum.” It was these same fans who screenshot the posts he shared on the ‘Kogi Political Forum’ group and sent to me. Apparently, he habitually shared the plagiarized materials simultaneously in both groups.”

Kperogi concluded in his e-mail that it is a “tragic misjudgment if indeed Atiku Abubakar offered someone like that the job of a Public Communication SA.”

Efforts to reach Shaibu have been unsuccessful as messages sent to him through his active social media account have yet to be replied. According to his Facebook page, Shaibu is the Chief Operating Officer of Media Stitch Ltd and is a former Resident Consultant of Public Communication and Strategy to the Delta State Governor.

Mbaka threatens Obi, Atiku with failure for refusing to donate in his church

EJIKE Mbaka, a controversial Catholic Priest in the Diocese of Enugu, has warned the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Presidential Aspirant, and his running mate, Peter Obi, that shame could be their lot if they continued to be “stingy”.

Mbaka said this during his parish’s 2018 harvest and bazaar event which was attended by several dignitaries including top politicians and government functionaries.

A video clip of the event was shared on a youtube named Onye njenje (meaning the traveller).

In the video, Mbaka was unhappy that Obi did not want to make a donation in public, but had said he would confer with the priest in private and that the congregation would eventually get to know what he did.

After Obi had spoken, Mbaka insisted that he should “do something for God”, asking him whether “Atiku gave you any message for our bazaar?”

“Is there something with which you will cut the tape or break kola nut or kill cow?” Mbaka asked.

The priest said that the former Governor of Abia State, Orji Uzor-Kalu, was supposed to be the chairman of the occasion, but that he sent in a message because he just returned to the country from medical treatment abroad.

According to Mbaka, Uzor-Kalu had wanted to come in person and celebrate mass with the congregation before announcing the project he would sponsor for them.

Recall that Uzor-Kalu is currently standing trial before a Federal High Court in Lagos for defrauding Abia State of about N7.7 billion when he was the state Governor between 1999 and 2007. His bail was revoked recently after he travelled to Germany for medical treatment without the court’s permission.

Turning to Peter Obi, Mbaka said, “We ask God to bless our brother Peter Obi, but when Atiku comes in person we will see whether to bless him or not. But tell him that the way he is going so far, it doesn’t appear he would achieve much.”

“The way he is going about it now, he has already failed,” Mbaka said.

Again, after Obi politely refused to make any pronouncement, Mbaka asked Obi to “stand before God’s people and tell God what he would do for him”.

“Or it means you don’t want to do anything for God. You’re just being unnecessarily cunning,” Mbaka said.

Even to this, Obi insisted that he would confer with the Priest in private. “Everybody knows that I don’t make political statements. I am a fundamental Catholic and whatever I promise to do in the church, I do,” Obi said.

But Mbaka would not bulge, he insisted: “It’s better for you to listen to me and stop this thing you are saying here. God hates stinginess. I’m not trying to please you, rather I’m saying what could save your life. Otherwise, you and Atiku will fail.”

“If you have a good adviser, you can save your political destiny,” Mbaka continued. “Or by 2019, you people won’t even know when or how the election will hold and concluded.

“Listen to me, you are about to enter somewhere special. Vice President of the whole country is not (boys) scout, it’s not a mass server.

“The Ebonyi person came here, he didn’t announce his donation, but the way he said it, everybody clapped for him. Ugwuanyi (Enugu State Governor) did not announce anything, but the way he did it, there was a clap.”

However, despite Mbaka’s insistence, Obi did not make any donation before the microphone was given to Hope Uzodimma, the All Progressives Congress’ candidate for the governorship position in Imo State.

Uzodimma said he, together with Osita Okechukwu, the Managing Director of Voice of Nigeria, was sent by President Buhari to grace the event.

During the 2015 election, Mbaka became popular after he made a U-turn and endorsed Buhari to win the presidential election after having sided with Jonathan initially.

However, he has also criticised the Buhari administration saying it had inflicted pain and hardship on the people.

EFCC uncovers N500m worth of properties traced to ex – Plateau governor

0

THE Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has traced properties worth N5 billion to former Plateau State Governor, Jonah Jang, who is currently standing trial for money laundering.

The properties are located at No. 8 and 9 Gobarau Road Unguwan Rimi GRA Kaduna State.

Preliminary investigations according to a statement signed by Tony Orilade, acting head, media and publicity, EFCC, on Monday revealed that the properties were purchased from New Capital Properties Limited, a subsidiary of Northern Nigerian Development Company, NNDC, Kaduna.

It would be recalled that the EFCC on May 7, filed 12 count charges against the immediate past governor for an alleged fraud of about N6.3 billion.

A serving senator representing Plateau-North Senatorial District, Mr Jang is being prosecuted before a Plateau State High Court for allegedly embezzling funds released to the state by the Central Bank of Nigeria.

The former governor is also said to have abused his office as the governor by collecting money to the tune of N4.3 billion from the state coffers through the cashier of the Office of the Secretary to the State Government, Yusuf Pam.

Pam, who is also charged along with Jang, was said to have corruptly used his office for personal enrichment to the tune of N11.5million.

One of the 12 count charges against the serving senator revealed that he allegedly diverted N2 billion released by the CBN for disbursement to Small and Medium Enterprises in the state under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Funds, just a month before the expiration of his tenure in April 2015.