THE Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) has said Nigeria’s cautious approach to the endorsement of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)/G20 Inclusive Framework two-pillar solution to the taxation of the digital economy is in the best interest of the country.
The FIRS explained in a statement issued today that the key reason was to ensure Nigeria did not lose out on potential revenue from the digital economy.
READ ALSO:
Our members jobless, consider ‘Diaspora Window’ option for us, BDCs tell CBN
Tax payment: FAAC, FIRS rank NNPC high despite zero FAAC remittance
FIRS seeks increased collaboration among African countries in driving digital tax businesses
FIRS offers concession to taxpayers with foreign currency tax liabilities
Explaining the reason in the statement, the Executive Chairman of the FIRS, Muhammed Nami, said that Nigeria, having reviewed the conditions of the agreement, had concerns over the impact that the signing of the agreement would have on its tax system and tax revenue generation.
“There are serious concerns on how the rules would compound the issues in our tax system. For instance, to be able to tax any digital sale or any multinational enterprise (MNEs), that company or enterprise must have an annual global turnover of €20 billion and a global profitability of 10 per cent.
“That is a concern. This is because most MNEs that operate in our country do not meet such criteria and we would not be able to tax them.
“Secondly, the €20 billion global annual turnover in question is not just for one accounting year, but it is that the enterprise must make €20 billion revenue and 10 per cent profitability in average for four consecutive years, otherwise that enterprise will never pay tax in our country, but in the country where the enterprise comes from, or its country of residence,” Nani said..
He further noted that for Nigeria to subject a multinational enterprise to tax under the rule, the entity must have generated, at least, €1 million turnover from Nigeria within a year.
He regarded that as an unfair position, especially to domestic companies, which, with a minimum of above N25 million (about €57,000) turnover, are subject to companies’ income tax in Nigeria.
He feared the rule would take away many multinational enterprises from the scope of those currently paying taxes to Nigeria.
“In other words, even the MNEs that are currently paying taxes in Nigeria would cease to pay taxes to us because of this rule,” he said.
On the issue of dispute resolutions under the Two-Pillar Solution, the FIRS Chairman explained that the rules were such that in the event of a dispute between Nigeria and an MNE, Nigeria would be subject to an international arbitration panel as against Nigeria’s own justice system.
“It would be subject to international arbitration and not Nigeria’s judicial system and laws, even where the income is directly related to a Nigerian member of an MNE group, which is ordinarily subject to tax in Nigeria on its worldwide income, and subject to the laws of Nigeria.
“We are concerned about getting a fair deal from such process. More so, such a dispute resolution process with a multinational enterprise in an international arbitration panel outside the country would lead to heavy expenses on legal services, traveling and other incidental costs.
“Nigeria would spend more, even beyond the tax yield from such cases,” he stated.
On whether Nigeria could be losing significant revenue if it failed to sign the agreements, Nami said that would not be a problem as the country had already put forward four ongoing solutions to the challenge of taxation of the digital economy.
“One, we have made it a point of practice to annually amend our tax laws to reflect the current global realities. It was courtesy of these reviews that we developed the Significant Economic Presence (SEP) rule, through the Finance Act of 2019 and 2020. The SEP rules set threshold for MNEs without physical presence in Nigeria for registration and payment of taxes to the country.
“Two, we have deployed technology in order for us to bring digital transactions to the tax net. Coupled with the SEP rule, we have started seeing the impact of the technology we have deployed. Companies like Twitter, Facebook, Netflix and LinkedIn, among others, who have no physical presence in Nigeria and were hitherto not paying taxes have now registered for tax purposes and are paying taxes accordingly. A positive to this is that we surpassed our target in the year 2021, despite the challenge posed to the global economy, including our own economy, by the Covid-19 pandemic.
“The third initiative is the Data-4-Tax Initiative, a blockchain technology which FIRS is jointly developing with the Internal Revenue Service of the 36 states and that of the FCT, under the auspices of the Joint Tax Board. With this project, we are confident that we are going to have a seamless view and access to all economic activities of individuals and corporate bodies in Nigeria going forward, including money spent on digital commerce.
“The fourth is that we have set up a specialised office, the Non-Resident Persons Tax Office, to manage the taxation of non-resident persons and cross-border transactions, including all tax treaty operational issues and income derived from Nigeria by non-resident individuals and companies,” he said.
The FIRS Chairman appreciated members of the Nigerian public who had raised concerns at various occasions over Nigeria’s decision not to endorse the Two-Pillar solution, stating that their concerns came from a place of genuine passion and patriotism anchored on seeking a better Nigeria.
“The concerns over Nigeria’s decision not to endorse the agreement are well understood by us. We know that these questions come from a place of genuine concern and passion for a better Nigeria. We appreciate your patriotism,” he said.
Harrison Edeh is a journalist with the International Centre for Investigative Reporting, always determined to drive advocacy for good governance through holding public officials and businesses accountable.