Electoral Act: Senate president accuses judiciary of interference

SENATE President Ahmad Lawan has accused the judiciary of interference in the law-making process after an Abuja Federal High Court barred the National Assembly from tampering with the newly amended Electoral Act.

The court gave the order on Monday while ruling on an application filed by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).


Buhari asks National Assembly to amend newly signed Electoral Act

10 key provisions of the electoral bill awaiting Buhari’s decision

Electoral reform: Buhari gets 6th chance as National Assembly transmits amended bill

2023 Election: House of Representatives to reintroduce electoral bill on Wednesday

Lawan condemned the development while speaking at plenary on Tuesday.

“The Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday, March 07, 2022, barred President Muhammadu Buhari, the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) and the Senate President from tampering with the newly amended Electoral Act 2022.

“The judge, in a ruling on an ex-parte application by the opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), said the Electoral Act, having become valid law, could not be altered without following the due process of law.

“I find it very necessary to talk at this point because, with the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, our governance system is based on the presidential system of government where there is a clear cut separation of powers and exercise of powers,” the Senate president said.

According to Lawan, the judiciary cannot stop the National Assembly from performing its legislative duties.

    He added, “I believe the members of the National Assembly know their work, know their onions and would do what is right. This is due process; we are not doing anything outside the law. It is within our exclusive right to consider whatever request we receive from Nigerians either from the executive or private member bill.”

    President Muhammadu Buhari signed the electoral bill into law on February 25 but pleaded with the lawmakers to consider the outright deletion of Section 84 (12).

    The section has to do with the resignation of political appointees before party primaries.

    The president, in a letter to the National Assembly, noted that the provision amounted to the disenfranchisement of political appointees.

    A reporter with the ICIR
    A Journalist with a niche for quality and a promoter of good governance

    Join the ICIR WhatsApp channel for in-depth reports on the economy, politics and governance, and investigative reports.

    Support the ICIR

    We invite you to support us to continue the work we do.

    Your support will strengthen journalism in Nigeria and help sustain our democracy.

    If you or someone you know has a lead, tip or personal experience about this report, our WhatsApp line is open and confidential for a conversation


    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    Support the ICIR

    We need your support to produce excellent journalism at all times.


    Most read