‘We’ve identified their barracks’, Falana speaks on Lekki shootings
FEMI Falana, human rights lawyer and chairman of the Alliance on Surviving COVID-19 And Beyond (ASCAB), says the group has identified the barracks of the soldiers who shot at #ENDSARS protesters at Lekki toll gate on Tuesday.
“We have already identified the barracks where the soldiers left for Lekki, we have already identified the barracks,” Falana said.
He made the claim during his appearance on ARISE TV on Monday.
Falana, who stated ASCAB would set up an independent panel of inquiry to investigate the October 20 shootings, said from findings by the group, there were indications that President Muhammadu Buhari was aware of plans to deploy the military to Lekki disrupt the protest.
READ ALSO:
- NAFDAC bans India company for manufacturing substandard medicines
- Tinubu makes U-turn, commiserates with victims of Lekki shootings
- Lekki Shooting: Human Rights Lawyer, Adegboruwa says Fashola tampered with evidence during visit
- ‘Return looted items in 48 hours or face the law’, Police in Plateau warns
- We kept looted COVID-19 palliatives for vulnerable people – NGF
- Lekki killings: I don’t own toll gate, didn’t order military actions -Tinubu
- Army pledges loyalty to Buhari, as Buratai orders troops to respond ‘decisively’ to attacks
“The President was likely to have been told, soldiers were ordered so I want to believe that’s why it was not addressed and they said it was a rumour but I think the facts are emerging now, that indeed soldiers went to Lekki, indeed they fired at protesters and indeed some of the protesters at least two have been officially acknowledged to have died from gunshot wounds.”
“ASCAB shall establish an Independent National Citizen’s Panel of Inquiry under a number of conditions Composition of the Citizen’s Panel of Inquiry shall comprise representatives of credible and identified organisations of the youth that took part in the #Endsars protest movement, including the Feminist Coalition, among others; representatives of credible and tested civil society organisations,” he said.
Falana also accused the federal government of having no respect for the rule of law and citizens rights to protest.
He noted that constant denials of human abuses by the federal government and its agencies clearly portrays that Nigeria is not a serious country.
“I have never seen it anywhere in the world where in the federal capital of a country where you have all the embassies, you have unmarked vehicles taking thugs round and it was being filmed and the thugs were being ferried by officials of the government and we are being told it’s not the State Security Service and in Lagos it was not the Nigerian Army that shot.
“Such denials do not portray Nigeria as a serious country, because it is the duty of the government anywhere in the world to trace those criminals and bring them to book.
“Nigerian government has no respect for the rule of law and has ensured they stave off all forms of protests in the country.”
The human rights lawyer frowned at continuous efforts by the Muhammadu Buhari administration to crackdown on peaceful protesters across the country.
“Every designated venue for protest in the country has been fenced by the government to prevent demonstrations.
In Lagos, the Gani Fawehinmin square in Lagos has been fenced while the Unity fountain in Abuja has also been fenced, and the same government has said citizens have the right to protest.”
Last week, there were reports of sporadic shootings at unarmed #ENDSARS protesters at Lekki tollgate by soldiers on Tuesday night.
Before the shootings, there was a power outage and alledged removal of CCTV cameras from the toll gate, as captured by video camera.
Several people sustained injuries and from gunshots. An eyewitness account claimed that more than 15 persons were killed by soldiers during the attack.
Also, the Lagos state government also confirmed two persons that died while receiving treatment as a result of the shootings.
The military actions have attracted wide criticism for the Nigerian government with the United Nations and the United States calling for a probe into the incident.
But the Nigerian Defence Headquarters which has continued to deny soldiers were involved in the shootings.
It claimed that the videos circulating on social media as evidence of involvement were photoshopped.
John Eneche, Director of Information, Defence Headquarters, in a press conference on Friday, described it as mere allegations, stressing that some military analysts had dismissed as untrue.
“I will say that for now, don’t take any response from me that yes we did it or no, but from what I can see, from all the evidence, as a general, I will tell you that it may not be true,” said Eneche.
NAFDAC bans India company for manufacturing substandard medicines
THE National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) has blacklisted an Indian Company, Mars Remedies PVT Limited for manufacturing falsified Ciprofloxacin Tablets BP 500mg with NAFDAC registration NO, C4-0498 for Pinnacle Health Pharmaceutical Limited.
This is contained in a statement signed by Moji Christianah Adeyeye, the Director-General of NAFDAC and made available to The ICIR on Monday.
“In view of the unprofessional practice, the Agency states that all products manufactured by the Mars Remedies PVT LTD, 635, GIDC Estate Waghodia, Vadodara, Gujarat, India, will not be allowed into Nigeria with immediate effect,” the statement read.
NAFDAC said the company was blacklisted in a letter dated October 9, 2020, addressed to the Managing Director of Mars Remedies PVT Limited, and titled; “Notice of blacklisting as a manufacturer of substandard and falsified medicines.
READ ALSO:
- ‘We’ve identified their barracks’, Falana speaks on Lekki shootings
- How Nigeria’s #ENDSARS protesters embraced Twitter as rallying point to demand justice
- EndSARS: FG to support youth with N25bn, says Finance Minister
- EndSARS: NECO suspends SSSCE indefinitely, cites insecurity
- Kwara Gov pledges ₦500m relief fund for owners of looted businesses
- TRUE, 69 boys were affected, 21 die in 1959 fire at Arkansas Negro Boys Industrial School
- Ndume faults calls to slash NASS members’ pay, says it has no effect on economy
According to the statement, the company violated the NAFDAC extant laws and regulations by illegally manufacturing different formulations of Ciprofloxacin tablets instead of the approved formulation for export to Nigeria.
NAFDAC further noted in the statement that the variation in the formulation of the Ciprofloxacin 500mg tablets, which may impact on the product quality and shelf –life, was not approved by the Agency before the changes were made.
“This constitutes a violation of the NAFDAC Act, noting with dismay that the company has displayed a flagrant disregard for compliance with global standards necessary to assure the production of quality assured products,” Adeyeye said.
The Director-General warned other manufacturers and importers of medicines to adhere strictly to the conditions for which their products were registered by NAFDAC or face similar sanctions.
Disinheritance: Widows in Igboland battle culture and society (Part 1)
This report by Alfred AJAYI presents the experiences and testimonies of widows and other stakeholders from South-Eastern Nigeria, where the practice of disinheritance of widows is prevalent.
“AFTER the death of my husband, we put him in the mortuary. But without my knowledge, his close friend connived with my brothers-in-law to take away his corpse from the Teaching Hospital at Nnewi. They then insisted that I must complete the family house my husband was building in the village and I must perform the “Igbuefi” meaning (killing of cow) on behalf of their father, who died since 1991, before the burial could take place”.
This was thirty-year-old widow, Ijeoma Ubah, narrating her ordeal in the hands of her husband’s family members shortly after he died on 7th January, 2018.
She continued: “My dear, I did it. I even sold my husband’s highlander to meet up. Then, I asked them to bring the corpse for burial. They said no, that it is time for me to go back to my father’s house with my three daughters. They even came and verbally shared the rooms in our house. At that point, I became confused. That was before somebody gave me the contact of National Human Rights Commission”.
Death of one’s husband is unarguably a devastating experience, especially for young women who are still nursing young children. It is naturally expected that the condition of such widows will provoke empathy from relations, friends and people of good conscience. But, in parts of Africa, that is not always the case as some of them face forceful ejection from their home, while others are forced to either sleep with the dead bodies of their husbands or drink the water used to bathe the corpses to prove that they had no hand his death.
The climax of such dehumanizing widowhood practices is the disinheritance of the widows by close or distant relations of their late husbands, who lay claim to all that their brother’s estates, including property and wealth gotten in partnership with their wives. The matter is worse in families where men were the breadwinners and the widowed women had been full – time housewives.
A woman, who has no male child or has no child at all, is usually at greater risk; same as those suspected to have been responsible for the death of their husbands.
Such practices which are common among the Igbo of the South East of Nigeria, have led to abuse, disinheritance, impoverishment and trauma suffered by many widows in the region.
Disinheritance is a violation of the constitutionally guaranteed right of the widows to freedom from discrimination as provided for in Section 42 of the 1999 constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended), which states that no citizen of Nigeria shall be discriminated against regardless of their place of origin, sex, religion or political opinion.
Nigeria is a signatory to several international documents and conventions, which protect women against discrimination in any form, including issues of inheritance. One of them is the Declaration on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, DEDAW, which was adopted by the United Nations on November 7, 1967. In its Article one, the Declaration maintains that discrimination against women is “fundamentally unjust and constitutes an offence against human dignity”.
Article two abolishes laws and customs, which discriminate against women, for equality under the law to be recognized, and for states to ratify and implement existing UN human rights instruments against discrimination, while article three calls for public education to eliminate prejudice against women.
Another document that frowns at discrimination against the women folks is the legally binding Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination against Women, CEDAW, which came into existence on 18 December, 1979.
In its article sixteen, the convention, in addressing issue of marriage and family relations, gives equal rights and obligations to women and men with regard to choice of spouse, parenthood, personal rights and command over property. In specific terms, this article gives equal right to the spouses in respect to ownership, acquisition, management, administration, enjoyment, and disposition of property, whether free of charge or for a valuable consideration.
The Charter for Widows’ Rights is another document which particularly, demands the elimination of all discrimination against widows, both within the family, in community and public life.
Article two of the Widow’s Charter states that widows shall have the right to inherit from their husband’s estate, whether or not the deceased spouse left a will, while widows may not be “inherited” as wives or concubines to their husband’s brother, nor forcibly placed in a “levirate” relationship, nor forcibly made pregnant by a relative in order to continue producing children in her dead husband’s name.
The article adds that anyone, who attempts or manages to deprive a widow of any of her property, take custody of her children, without an order of a judge or magistrate shall be guilty of the most serious category of crime, while anyone, whether a relative or a stranger, who seeks or manages to gain control of the dead husband’s bank account, insurance policy, accident compensation claims, without the order of the Court is guilty of the most serious category of crime.
Man’s inhumanity to women

Cynthia Nweke, from Ezzama, in Ezza South Local Government Area of Ebonyi State, was heart-broken as she narrated her experience battling against efforts to disinherit her with royal complicity.
“This is the picture of the only farmland we have now. My husband secured the property by surveying it. But, immediately he died, his brothers came to take away the land. I saw my husband’s relations surveying the land. So, I took the survey plan my husband did many years ago to the Igwe to help me. But, Igwe told me it was rubbish, that my husband has no right to survey a family land.
“My husband’s brothers had collected the frontage of our house and one of our lands we have been cultivating since I married this man. They collected another one in a swampy area. The traditional ruler, Ezeogo passed a judgment that I should leave the land because they will kill me. But, I told him that I will not leave the only land that I am cultivating to feed my children.
“One of those doing this to me was a servant to my late husband, who said my husband did not settle him and also made sexual advances to me after his death but I refused. He promised to deal with me and he is the one who mobilized them against me”.

Another widow, Precious Ngozi Nwali, from Amaeka Community, in Ezza South Local Government Area of Ebonyi State, narrated how documents of lands and other property were deceitfully taken away from her after the death of her husband, leaving her with nothing to train her four children.
“My husband died after a brief illness on the February 6, 2019. After his death, his elder brother, Monday Nwali, and his siblings in a meeting in the village, collected his phone from me, harvested the yams and cassava we planted and did not give my children and me from the proceeds.
On February 11, 2019, my husband’s younger sister, who is lawyer, led others to our residence in Abakaliki and deceitfully took all the documents for all our lands, a vehicle and a fridge away. She promised to give back to me in three months when I would have recovered from the shock and agony of his demise, but she has refused to do that”.
Precious also alleged that she had been threatened severally by one of her brothers-in-law for daring to demand for the documents taken away from her.
“On one occasion, he came to the timber shed Nkwoagu with some persons to chase me out of my husband’s shed where I am staying right now to trade. He said he would either give it to his younger brother or rent it out. In facts they have told me severally to go and remarry if I am not comfortable with their actions.”
While this was happening, the widow said her husband’s elder brother “went and claimed one of my husband’s land with the money realized from the burial ceremony.”
It was gathered that the International Federation of Women Lawyers, FIDA, Ebonyi State Chapter had taken up Precious’ matter.
Ijeoma Ubah, a widow who resides in Onitsha, the commercial nerve centre of Anambra State, also recounted her experience after the death of her husband.
“After the burial, I asked my husband’s friend to give me the document of the land he helped my husband to buy at Akpaka Phase Two, Enugu, at the cost of N2.5 million (two million, fifty thousand naira). That was our first project as a family.
“He shouted at me. I explained to him that I have paid all the people my husband owed and needed money to take care of my three daughters. I waited for months, no response from him.
“In January this year, I went back to National Human Rights Commission. Through their efforts, he provided an allocation letter, the commission promised to investigate the genuineness of the document from Ministry of Lands. We are still waiting. But, I noticed that the allocation letter bore March 14, 2016 when my husband was still alive. So, it means he had the document all the while but refused to give to my husband. The allocation letter also carried his name not my husband’s name”.
When Anayo Nnoye got married to her husband from Ifite Enugwu-Agidi, Njikoka Local Government Area, of Anambra State, in 2006, little did she know that the union would not last. Her husband died in 2008 and that marked the beginning of her problems. Shortly after the burial, she was ejected from her house by the senior wife and her son, while the farmland she was cultivating was taken away from her.
She recounted: “The first wife of my husband and her first son have pursued me out of my husband’s house. They no dey pity say I get four pikin. The son, Mike, had been selling the property of my husband. There was one he sold for N7 million, another one for N5 million, he no give me anything. The kindred talk to him to give me my own share. The Igwe and the village people support me but he no dey listen to them.
“It was the Human Rights Commission that is helping me to get my share now. They come with Igwe, kindred, the youths, even the police and vigilante and carry me go to the farm, share five plots of my husband’s land to me and my children but my senior wife and her son did not show up that day.
“Since then, Mike carry juju put there. If I want to sell that land, I no go see buyer. I am not asking for the money of those ones he had sold again, but let him leave the five plots the village, Igwe and relations have given to me,” Nonye appealed.
Obiagali Ogbodo, a widow from Ugwuaji-Awkunanaw community in Enugu South Local Government Area, who had a daughter before her husband’s death, complained that her brother-in-law has taken over the plots of land and shops she owned with her late husband and appeals for help. Her offence, it appeared, was not having a male child for her husband.
“I had twins, a boy and a girl before my husband died but the boy died, so I have just a girl. However, my husband’s younger brother shared ten plots of land and 15 shops but didn’t give me anything because my child is a girl. So I appeal to government to intervene,” Mrs. Ogbodo cries out.
But there are situations where in-laws or the community also dispossesses widows who have male children of their husband’s property. Such was the experience of Elizabeth Obodoeze from Umuofiagu-Ukehe in Igboetiti Local Government Area, who alleged that the leadership of the community destroyed cashew, palm, oil bean and other economic trees in a large expanse of land belonging to her late husband, claiming that it was a ploy to dispose her of the land.
“Nobody informed me that they were going to cut down economic trees planted by my husband and no reason was given for the destruction. They also destroyed my brother in-law’s son’s house that reached the lintel level, cut down all my palm trees, oil bean trees, cashew trees which are my source of livelihood, I don’t know why they did that. The town union and village levy collectors tax us ₦4,400 yearly and we pay but don’t know why, because others are allowed to harvest their own palm fruits without disturbance. The day they destroyed the trees and the building they were well armed with machete, dagger and iron rod,” Mrs. Ogbodoeze lamented.
Mrs Obodoeze passionately appealed to the government to come to her aid.
“We have taken palm wine to the eldest man so that the leadership of the town will explain what we did wrong but they couldn’t tell us anything. It is not land tax but sheer wickedness and cruelty against us, widows. So I am appealing to Government to assist me, a poor widow, they are intimidating and marginalizing us, they want to kill me and my children.”
Disinheritance a grave concern in the South-East
Interviews conducted in the three selected states of the South East Region – Anambra, Ebonyi and Enugu – revealed that disinheritance has always been an epic battle between the culture of the Igbos and the laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, which is not likely to be resolved soon
From Ebonyi State, Mrs Elizabeth Nwali, the Chairperson of Family Law Centre, established by the State Government to look into family-related matters, expressed worry that the right of widows to inheritance continues to be violated in the 21 Century, even by educated and enlightened persons.
“Disinheritance of widows is the order of the day here in Ebonyi. People seem not to know that the widows have rights over the husbands’ property. In one of the cases we are handling now, brothers to the late husband took away all the property belonging to him from the wife, even pulling down the wall of the building.
“They said that the woman will not have any inheritance from her husband. They even went to the police and lied against her. But, I am going to the police to counter all they said against her. It is serious worry for us here because it keeps gaining prominence every day”.
The Chairperson, International Federal of Women Lawyers (FIDA), in Ebonyi State, Grace Chima, and the Co-ordinator, Legal Aid Council of Nigeria in the state, Okwuegbe Egenti, also spoke about the interventions by their organizations.
Chima recalled: “After the death of her husband, a widow with four children kept document with somebody and said after the burial give it back to me. And after the burial, the person refused to give her the document. They invited the widow into their family meeting and told her to accept their decision that her sister-in-law will keep the documents or she goes to remarry, if she is no longer comfortable with it.
“So, it was clear that they planned to frustrate her, so they can claim the property of her late husband. But, we promised we would get justice for her. We are on it already, using Alternative Dispute Resolution, ADR. If that fails, we shall go to court until justice is served”.
Egenti noted that widows find it difficult to lay hands on anything belonging to their late husbands.
“We have about three cases like that in Afikpo, where this practice is prevalent. We won one of them last year before my Lord Justice Ogbu. A woman lost her husband (a police Inspector) and the sister to the dead man chased the wife away from the husband’s house, warning her to go back to her father’s house, since she had no child for the late brother. We took it up till we won”
The Co-ordinator of NHRC in Anambra State, Nkechi Ugwuanyi, confirmed that disinheritance is among the biggest challenges facing widows, some of who are even disinherited by their sons.
“It is disheartening, terrible, unthinkable and sad that women in the South-East find themselves in such situation. We have several cases on this issue of disinheritance of widows. When a woman loses her husband, naturally, the extended family immediately comes in. all they are thinking of is the property of the man. Even sons disinherit their mothers. In one of such cases going on in Onitsha, the court had given an order that tenants in the property in conflict should pay to the widow, but her son has refused to obey the court order. Sometimes, the relations are bribed with peanut to side with the violators”.
The Executive Director, Women Information Network, WINET, Enugu State, and former chairperson of Nigeria Association of Women Journalists, NAWOJ, Miriam Menkiti, said she became an advocate against disinheritance of widows when, as NAWOJ leader, she found out in various communities they were being marginalized, disinherited.
“So, we championed what we called the “Prohibition of Infringement of Widow’s and Widower’s Fundamental Rights Bill”, with the assistance of Hon. Uche Anya, the Minority Leader in the House then, who sponsored it as Private Member Bill. It was passed in 2001 and former Governor Chimaroke Nnamani signed it into law.”
“Unfortunately, because of greed, many family members still rob widows of the property of their late husbands’ property, disinherit them, take lands and houses belonging to their husbands, not minding that they have children. A few women had been able to use the law to safeguard themselves from such inhuman practice. Some enlightened people also take part in this repulsive treatment against the widows. But, I must say that there are a few families where they ensure that the widow is taken care of”.
Why widows are disinherited – stakeholders
Why has the practice of disinheriting the widows continued despite all legal frameworks and judicial pronouncements as well as international protocols and documents against it?
The traditional ruler of Umuawulu, in Awka South Local Government Area of Anambra State, Igwe Joel Egwuonwu, attributed it to sheer greed among the relations of the dead as well as bad manners among some women, who quarrel with their in-laws during the life time of their husbands.

“Some women are the architects of their problems. Some of them are hostile to relations of their husbands, especially if such men are rich. They drive brothers, sisters, friends and other relations away. If unfortunately, such men die, the relations who had been badly treated see that as an opportunity to get back at such women.
“However, many relations are very greedy and don’t fear god. They want to take away all the widows had suffered with their husbands to put together. But, if that woman is good to her husband’s relations, friends and other people around before her husband died, she will see people who will stand with her against whoever wants to take away her husband’s property”.
For the chairperson, FIDA, Anambra State chapter, Ikpeze Ogugua, disinheritance of widows cannot be divorced from culture and tradition.
“Disinheritance is a harmful traditional practice. In Igboland, even after you get married to a family, the people there still see as if somebody who came. Then you ask – if they can deny their daughters inheritance, why will they not do the worse to a widow?
“Every culture still in existence in Igboland is pro-men and against the female folks. More unfortunate and annoying is that the easterners claim to be Christians and all they are shouting and glowing about is culture and maybe, fetish. Disinheritance is at variance with 1999 constitution of Nigeria, which in section 42 talks about non-discrimination in whatever guise, whether by state of origin, sex, religion, any form of discrimination”.
Ugwuanyi also enumerated other factors that trigger the problem.“You can’t divorce it from poverty, lack of love and knowledge of existing human rights laws, lack of respect for human rights. In some cases, we discovered that violators don’t know they are offending the law. That speaks to the issue of under-reporting”.
CLICK HERE TO READ THE SECOND PART OF THIS STORY.
Tinubu makes U-turn, commiserates with victims of Lekki shootings
BOLA Tinubu, the National Leader of the All Progressive Congress (APC) has commiserated with victims of the Lekki shootings, after earlier demanding they answer questions about why they were at the scene of the incident in the first place.
“I heavily grieve for those who have lost their lives or been injured during the period of these protests,” Tinubu shared in a post on his official Twitter handle less than 24 hours after stating that victims of the Lekki shootings were liable for the misfortune of what many have tagged ‘Lekki Massacre.’
Tinubu, while speaking at the Lagos State House in Marina during a visit to Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu on Saturday, October 24, had demanded that #EndSARS protesters explain what they were doing at the Lekki Toll Gate Plaza when soldiers believed to be from the Nigerian Army opened fire at them while singing the national anthem and waving the Nigerian flag .
“Casualties of Lekki Shootings have some questions to answer; how are they there? How long were they there? What kind of characters are they?,” the APC National Leader had quizzed.
On October 20, #EndSARS protesters gathered at the Lekki Toll Gate plaza to demand an end to police brutality across the country – an exercise that they had carried on for 12 consecutive days in different states in Nigeria.
However, just a few minutes to 7pm on that day, the protesters came under attacks when security personnel in Nigerian Army uniform opened fire at them.
Amnesty International, a global human rights advocacy group confirmed that its on-ground investigations showed that at least a dozen people were killed on that day.
But despite evidence of deaths, the government has denied cases of any fatality.
Babajide Sanwo-Olu, the Governor of Lagos State had in a live broadcast to residents of the state on Wednesday, October 21, said images and video footages of the shootings circulating on social media were false, stating that there were no records of any deaths.
Meanwhile, Fatou Bensouda, top prosecutor at the International Criminal Court (ICC) on Thursday disclosed that her office has received reports of crimes committed during the #EndSars protests and the Court is keeping a close watch on the developments.
The United Nations had also earlier reacted to the killing of protesters in Nigeria by the government forces, calling for calm.
Lekki Shooting: Human Rights Lawyer, Adegboruwa says Fashola tampered with evidence during visit
EBUN Adegboruwa, human rights lawyer and member of the Lagos State Judicial Panel of Inquiry into alleged misconducts of the defunct Special Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS) says Babatunde Fashola, the Minister of Works and Housing tampered with evidence during his visit to the Lekki Toll Plaza after the incident of shootings of protesters on Tuesday, October 20.
Adegboruwa said this in a statement issued on Monday expressing concerns over the minister’s and other governors visit to the site of alleged killings on Tuesday, October 20.
“It was reported that in the course of the visit, the former governor of Lagos State and the Honourable Minister of Works and Housing, Babatunde Fashola, SAN, discovered a hidden camera, which he took,” Adegboruwa said.
“This is a clear case of illegally tampering with exhibits that may become useful to the Panel in the course of its assignment.”
According to him, since the panel has been vested with the jurisdiction over the Lekki Toll Plaza, it is illegal for anyone else to visit the plaza without the authority of the panel.
“Since the Panel has been vested with jurisdiction over the Lekki Toll Plaza, I verily believe that it is illegal for anyone else to conduct any visit to the said Lekki Toll Plaza in the absence of and without the authority and consent of the Panel,” he noted.
“It is contempt of the Panel for anyone to usurp the powers of the Panel in the way that has been reported. In this regard, the Panel will not shy away from summoning anyone who is alleged to be involved in any contemptuous act that may obstruct the course of justice.”
Adegboruwa further appealed to Babajide Sanwo-Olu, the Governor of Lagos State to allow the panel a full autonomy and independence as earlier promised during the inauguration.
In a video seen by The ICIR, Fashola picked up a camcorder at the Lekki toll plaza during the visit of South-West governors and ministers.
Sanwo-Olu had inaugurated the panel of inquiry to investigate alleged misconduct and reports of Police brutality most especially of the defunct SARS officials as demanded by ENDSARS protesters.
However, the governor expanded the panel’s investigation to the alleged killings at the Lekki Tollgate by armed men in military uniforms.
‘Return looted items in 48 hours or face the law’, Police in Plateau warns
THE Plateau State Command of the Nigeria Police Force has issued a 48-hour ultimatum to residents of the state to return ‘looted items’ during attacks on warehouses containing COVID-19 palliatives.
Donbey Peter, the Acting Police Public Relations Officer of the command said this in a statement issued on Monday in Jos, the state capital over the attack in some part of the state.
“We, therefore, wish to give the looters the grace to immediately return every looted item to the nearest local government secretariat not later than Wednesday, October 28,” Peter said.
“Anyone found in possession of any looted item after this date will be arrested and brought to book.”
According to him, Edward Egbuka, the State Commissioner of Police, has condemned the attacks noting that they were aimed at truncating the peace enjoyed in the state.
“The commissioner described it as an act of criminality aimed at truncating the tireless efforts of the Police and other security agencies at ensuring a peaceful Plateau,” he said.
He added that members of the public are also reminded that the 24-hour curfew imposed on the area was still in force, warning that anyone caught violating the order would be decisively dealt with.
For more than five days, residents of some states in Nigeria have invaded warehouses and made away with COVID-19 palliatives some of which were meant to have been distributed to members of the public in response to the pandemic.
Lagos, Ogun, Osun, Kaduna Kwara, Plateau states, and the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja among others have witnessed the attacks on warehouses where COVID-19 palliatives are kept.
Meanwhile, in a viral video, an officer of the Nigerian Army was seen urging residents of Ilorin, Kwara State capital, to loot but not to destroy public properties or attack anyone.
As the residents rushed out in numbers to take their portion of the COVID-19 palliatives in a warehouse, the soldier continued to chant, ‘just go in peace, don’t attack anybody.’
Video showing how soldiers handled people stealing palliatives in Ilorin pic.twitter.com/qktNU79zyp
— Naija (@Naija_PR) October 24, 2020
Lekki killings: I don’t own toll gate, didn’t order military actions -Tinubu
BOLA Tinubu, a former Governor of Lagos State and National Leader of the All Progressives Congress (APC) says he does not own the Lagos State Lekki Toll Gate.
“The slander aimed at me is based on the untruth that I own the toll gate concession. The hate mongers prevaricate that I ordered the Lekki assault because the protests had caused me to lose money due to the interruption of toll gate activity,” Tinubu said in an interview.
There were speculations that the military operations against unarmed #ENDSARS protesters at the Lekki Tollgate were ordered by Tinubu, to protect the toll plaza.
“Minus this alleged ownership, the slander employed against me falls to the ground as a heavy untruth. I ask people to thoroughly investigate the matter of my alleged ownership of the toll gate,” he said.
“By seeking facts, instead of being swayed by gossip, you will find I have no ownership interest or involvement in the toll gate. Having no business interests in the operation, my income remains unchanged whether one or 100,000 vehicles pass through that gate.”
While adding that the tollgate is a public asset, Tinubu proposed that it should be indefinitely closed because of the incident on Tuesday night.
He also called on the State Government to donate revenues from commercial tollgate to confirmed victims of Lekki attacks and police brutality in the state when it is reopened.
“At the bottom, the toll gate is a public asset. Given what has happened, I would like to propose to the government that the toll gate be left closed for an indefinite period,” he said.
“If it is reopened, revenues should be donated to the confirmed victims of the Lekki attack as well as to other identifiable victims of police brutality in Lagos.”
“Let the government use the money to compensate and take care of those who have lost life or limb in the struggle for all citizens to go about the quiet, peaceful enjoyment of life without fear of undue harassment at this or that checkpoint.”
Army pledges loyalty to Buhari, as Buratai orders troops to respond ‘decisively’ to attacks
THE Nigerian Army at a high-level meeting on Monday reiterated its loyalty to the President Muhammadu Buhari-led Federal Government of Nigeria.
The Army also vowed to ensure the unity and indivisibility of the country.
The meeting, which was convened by Tukur Buratai, the Chief of Army Staff was attended by all Principal Staff Officers, General Officers Commanding, and Field Commanders of the Nigerian Army. It held at the Army Headquarters, in Abuja.
The meeting came against the backdrop of escalating insecurity across the country after the #EndSARS protests had led to ongoing looting of public and private properties amid clashes between irate Nigerians and security agents.
A statement issued by Sagir Musa, a Colonel and acting Director of Army Public Relations, which disclosed details of the meeting suggested that the military authorities believed the security situation in the country posed a threat to the Buhari-led Federal Government.
To forestall any possible attempt to undermine the democratic government in the country, Buratai, at the beginning of the meeting, warned the military officers at the meeting that there was no room for ‘disloyalty’.
“At the meeting, the COAS, Lt. Gen. TY Buratai, made it unambiguously clear to the PSOs, GOCs and Field Commanders that there will be no room for disloyalty amongst all officers and soldiers of the Nigerian Army (NA). He directed that they (PSOs, GOCs, and Field Commanders) must reiterate to all their subordinates that the NA is determined to ensure democratic stability in Nigeria as the only panacea for development and progress,” Musa said.
“The best system of governance is democracy and we must all ensure that Nigeria’s democracy remains stable and steady,” he quoted Buratai as said.
“We will not allow any force, elements, or destabilizing agents in or outside our country to set our beloved country on fire. We remain resolute in doing everything possible to ensure that subversive elements, detractors, and other enemies of this great nation do not achieve their aims and objectives of destabilisation.”
Buratai, according to the statement, stressed that some groups and individuals were bent on destabilising Nigeria by all means.
The Army chief said the unnamed individuals and groups hijacked the #EndSARS protests.
”The events of the past few days in our dear nation have shown the determination of some unscrupulous individuals and groups to destabilize Nigeria by all means,” Buratai said.
“These individuals, groups and other undesirable elements have hijacked the peaceful #ENDSARS protest marches resulting in widespread violence, acts of wanton destruction and looting of public and private properties in many parts of the country. These acts led to the imposition of curfew in several states of the federation,” he added.
The statement further claimed that right from the onset of the #EndSARS protests, the Nigerian Army had been aware of the ‘grand design’ by the sponsors of the protests to draw it into the crisis.
It was silent on the role of the Army in the attack on unarmed protesters at the Lekki Tollgate on October 20.
A video from the incident, now known as ‘Lekki Killings’, had shown soldiers firing live bullets at protesters at the Tollgate. The Army had claimed that the video was ‘photoshopped’ and the statement issued after Monday’s meeting further suggested that the video was part of the ‘propaganda’ to set the people against the Army.
The statement said, “The plan was to embark on massive propaganda to discredit the military and the government so as to set the people against the Nigerian Army once it is called out to aid the civil authorities.”
“The Nigerian Army being aware of the devilish plan was careful not to be dragged in and issued the initial warning through a press release on 14 October 2020 of our resolve to secure and safeguard a United Nigeria.”
It added, “Now the detractors alongside their local and international collaborators have mischievously and deliberately misrepresented troops’ efforts to ensure compliance with the curfew imposed by legitimate civil authorities in Lagos and other states.”
“These agitators are falsely accusing the Nigerian Army of being responsible for the activities of the miscreants despite glaring evidence to the contrary.”
They have continually threatened to report the NA to the International Criminal Court (ICC) and also threatened various forms of sanctions against personnel and their families.”
Despite widespread misgivings over the role of the Army in the protests, the statement claimed that a ‘large percentage’ of Nigerians and the international community have started seeing through the smokescreen of falsehood and deliberate misrepresentation of facts being orchestrated by enemies of Nigeria and have retracted their earlier false publications.
Buratai, according to the statement, also said at the meeting that despite all the alleged provocation, “the Nigerian Army has continued to exercise restraint, applied all the Principles of Internal Security Operations and fully abided by the internationally recognised rules of engagement as contained in our published Standard Operating Procedures for Internal Security Operations which are derived from the International Human Rights Laws and are in accordance with the international principles guiding the use of force”.
The Nigerian Army had for long been accused of extra-judicial killings and excessive use of force against unarmed civilians in various operations targeted at quelling civil disturbances.
Global Rights group, Amnesty International, had in various reports, accused the Army of extra-judicial killings. Also, already, some civil society organisations and individuals have petitioned the ICC over the Army role in the Lekki Killings and other incidents in the #EndSARS protests.
But, in a defiant tone, the Nigerian Army said it was not afraid of the ICC.
According to the statement, Buratai “used the opportunity to re-emphasise that none of the PSOs, GOCs, Field Commanders and other officers and soldiers of the Nigerian Army should be afraid of the ICC for carrying out their legitimate duties as stated in the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) and other extant laws, rules, and regulations of Nigeria.”
“They have every right under the Constitution to carry out assigned and legitimate roles of maintaining law and order in aid of civil authorities and other security agencies. He (Buratai) reiterated that anyone who doubts their commitment to their constitutional responsibilities must be made to know that they remain committed, loyal, and unwavering in ensuring the unity, stability, and security of our dear country Nigeria. He charged them to show the detractors and other elements of destabilization that they are neither part of them nor in any way supportive of their activities at all times,” the statement added.
In what amounted to giving soldiers the licence to kill, the statement said Burarai “directed that any act of arson or attempt to kill or maim any military or security personnel and other law-abiding civilians “must be responded to quickly and decisively”.
The Army chief further directed the Army commanders to assist the police and other security agencies to enforce curfews imposed in various states by governors.
According to Buratai, in dealing with any security threat, the Army commanders must fully cooperate with personnel of the Nigerian Police Force and other security agencies and must ensure that everyone is in full compliance with imposed curfews and any other extant security instructions in force.
Buratai also alerted the PSOs, GOCs, and Field Commanders that the recent activities by unscrupulous elements have shown their desire to acquire arms and ammunition at all costs from security personnel.
The statement said no less than 10 AK-47 rifles have been lost to people it described as ‘miscreants’ in the past 2 weeks across the country with attendant loss of lives of personnel.
“He charged Commanders to nip in the bud this emerging trend at all cost and directed them to warn their troops on internal security or on guard duties outside the barracks to be at maximum alert at all times and to also deal decisively with any attack on their duty locations.
“General Buratai concluded that there is no choice between a democratically united, strong and prosperous Nigeria and a nation disunited in a state of anarchy and retrogression. We must all strive for a united, strong, stable, and progressive Nigeria.”
The statement disclosed that at the end of the meeting, the PSOs, GOCs, and Field Commanders resolved to “remain Loyal to the Federal Government of Nigeria under President Muhammadu Buhari” and also “ensure the unity and indivisibility” of the country.
The Nigerian Army also resolved to assist the Federal Government to bring an end to insecurity across the country and to prevent miscreants and criminals from hijacking the ENDSARS protest nationwide.
In the same vein, the Army resolved to “remain focus and not to be deterred by any local or international threats”.
The statement added that all Commanders have been directed to intensify joint training with the Nigerian Police Force and other sister security agencies to enhance inter-agency collaboration and cooperation.
The protesters are carting away food items and other materials believed to be palliatives donated for distribution to vulnerable Nigerians to cushion the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The orgy of violence has continued despite a dusk-to-dawn curfew imposed in various states by governors.
Several civilians have been killed in the course of the civil disturbances. Many security agents, mostly policemen, have also lost their lives.



