Home Blog Page 11

Denrele Edun marks 45th birthday with symbolic self-marriage

0

NIGERIAN media personality and actor Denrele Edun has marked his 45th birthday in an unusual way by symbolically ‘marrying’ himself, a move he says represents self-love, personal growth and appreciation for his life journey.

The entertainer, known for his bold fashion choices and energetic presence in the entertainment industry, shared a video on X showing himself dressed in a white suit, complete with a veil and bouquet, as part of the birthday celebration.

Explaining the meaning behind the gesture, Denrele said the decision was inspired by his belief that he remains the most important person in his life after decades of overcoming different experiences.

“Till death didn’t do is part. So, I married myself. Ater 45 years of chaos, glitter, survival, reinvention, controversy, resilience, heartbreak & triumph.

“I remain the greatest love story I’ve ever known. Signed, The Bride. The Groom. The HappilyEverAfter. HAPPY 45TH BIRTHDAY,” he wrote.

In another message, the television star reflected on his life since birth and said the symbolic ceremony was dedicated to every stage of his personal and professional journey.

“On June 13, 1981, a star was born. On June 13, 2026, he finally married his magic. I, Denrele, I am the bride and the groom,” he said.

“I am marrying every version of myself that fought to get here. Today, I marry the only person who never left my side: ME!”

He further described the event as a celebration of his resilience and individuality.

“The bride escaped. The legend remained. For years, they discussed the mask. Today, they meet the miracle. The bride was me. The groom was me. The happily-ever-after was mine.”

The announcement quickly attracted attention online, with many sharing divergent views on the decision.

Born Adenrele Oluwafemi Edun, the media figure studied English Language at the University of Lagos. He began his career as a model before becoming a household name in the early 2000s through his work as a television presenter and red-carpet host on Soundcity.

Over the years, Denrele has remained one of the most recognisable personalities in Nigeria’s entertainment scene, earning a reputation for his distinctive style, fearless self-expression and vibrant character.

Gunmen attack NIPSS, kill two soldiers, police officer

0

GUNMEN attacked staff quarters of the National Institute for Policy and Strategic Studies (NIPSS), Kuru, Plateau State, in the early hours of Tuesday, June 16, killing three security officers protecting the facility.

The Head of Public Affairs at NIPSS, Osime Samuel, confirmed the attack and death of three security officers. He did not give the details of the slain officers.

However, Daily Trust identified the officers as two soldiers and a police officer in a report.

Samuel stated that the situation had been brought under control through the swift intervention of security personnel and relevant agencies, adding that there was no immediate threat to participants, staff, residents or facilities of the institute.

“There is currently no threat to the safety of participants, staff, residents, or facilities of the Institute. Normal activities are continuing as scheduled,” he said.

“NIPSS is working closely with the appropriate authorities and will provide verified information as soon as it becomes available. We urge members of the public and the media to rely on official communications from the Institute and relevant security agencies,” he added.

He noted that the institute remained committed to the safety of its community and commended the professionalism of security personnel involved in the response.

However, sources told Daily Trust that the attackers appeared to have specifically targeted the residences of the Acting Director of Studies, Nima Salman-Mann, and another senior staff member, Haruna Dabin.

According to the sources, the two senior officials had received handwritten notes pasted on their doors on Saturday, demanding $100,000 and N15 million respectively, which were reportedly brought to the attention of the institute’s management before the attack.

The sources explained that while local vigilantes provide security during the day, soldiers and police personnel are stationed around the staff quarters at night, adding that the slain officers were killed during an exchange of gunfire with the assailants.

The attack on the nation’s premier policy and strategic think tank comes amid growing concerns over insecurity and the increasing vulnerability of public institutions and senior officials to violent attacks across the country.

 

IWMF opens applications for Kari Howard Fund for narrative journalism 2026

WOMEN and nonbinary journalists worldwide can now apply for the 2026 edition of the Kari Howard Fund for Narrative Journalism, a grant programme by the International Women’s Media Foundation (IWMF)that supports compelling, character-driven storytelling.

The fund honours the legacy of Kari Howard, a celebrated editor known for championing deeply human, narrative journalism. Through the programme, selected journalists will receive funding to report and publish impactful stories that illuminate important issues through the lives and experiences of ordinary people.

Successful applicants can receive grants averaging around $5,000 to support narrative journalism projects. Eligible projects must be reported and published in English anywhere in the world, with reporting and publication completed within six months of receiving the award.

Applicants must identify as a woman or nonbinary journalist; be a freelance or staff print journalist, or a print journalist leading a multimedia team; have journalism as their primary profession; and possess at least three years of professional journalism experience (excluding internships).

They are also expected to demonstrate editorial interest in the project or a strong publication record with established media outlets.

They should submit and publish their work in English.

Applications close on July 12, 2026, at 11:59 p.m. EST. Successful applicants are expected to be notified by early September 2026.

Interested journalists can submit their applications here.

Court revokes Sowore’s bail, orders his arrest

0

A FEDERAL High Court in Abuja on Tuesday, June 16, revoked the bail granted to prominent activist and publisher of Sahara Reporters, Omoyele Sowore.

It consequently issued a bench warrant for his arrest after he ‘failed’ to appear for proceedings in his ongoing cybercrime trial.

Mohammed Umar, the presiding judge, ordered Sowore’s arrest following an oral application by counsel to the State Security Services (SSS), Akinlolu Kehinde, a senior advocate, who argued that the defendant had failed to provide sufficient justification for his absence.

Sowore is facing prosecution by the SSS over allegations that he made false and defamatory statements against President Bola Tinubu by describing him as “a criminal” in posts he was said to have published on his X and Facebook accounts.

The matter was scheduled for ruling on an application filed by Sowore seeking the judge’s recusal from the case.

However, when the case was called on Tuesday, neither Sowore nor his lawyer, Marshall Abubakar, was present in court, according to the News Agency of Nigeria. 

The court was informed that the defendant had written a letter requesting an adjournment of the proceedings.

Opposing the request, Kehinde argued that no cogent reason had been advanced for Sowore’s absence and urged the court to revoke his bail and issue a warrant for his arrest.

The judge subsequently granted the application, revoked the defendant’s bail, and ordered his arrest.

The ICIR reports that the latest development marks a fresh twist in the Sowore-Federal Government’s cyberbullying case, which has generated controversy over freedom of expression, online criticism of public officials, and the use of Nigeria’s cybercrime laws.

Sowore responds

Reacting shortly after the ruling, Sowore claimed the decision was part of a deliberate attempt to intimidate him and insisted that he had appeared in court on Monday, June 15, when the matter was initially scheduled.

“It has been brought to my notice that the judge presiding over my case concerning ‘Tinubu is a criminal’ has revoked my bail, despite my presence in court yesterday, when the judge was not in attendance. Consequently, we requested a new date,” Sowore wrote on his social media accounts.

“The agenda for today was to consider my application seeking the judge’s recusal, but instead, he opted to revoke my bail in a bid to assert forceful control over the trial. I will confront these developments with determination and resilience,” he added.

Attached to the post was a letter dated June 15, 2026, addressed to the Deputy Chief Registrar of the Federal High Court, Abuja.

In the letter, Sowore stated that he was present in court on June 15 from about 8:20 a.m. until approximately 11:57 a.m., when he was informed by court registry officials that the court would not be sitting. He said no prior notice or reason was given for the judge’s absence.

Sowore subsequently requested that the ruling on his recusal application be fixed for July 2, 3, 14, 15, 17, or September 8, 9 and 10, or any other date convenient to the court.

The letter, which copied the prosecution counsel, bears a Federal High Court Abuja registry stamp dated June 15, 2026, indicating it was received by the court.

Backstory

The case stems from social media posts published in August 2025 in which Sowore described Tinubu as a ‘criminal’ and accused him of making false claims about corruption in Nigeria.

The Federal Government, through the state secret police, subsequently filed a five-count criminal charge against Sowore, currently the presidential candidate of the Africa Action Congress (AAC), accusing him of cyberbullying, spreading false information capable of disturbing public order, and defaming Tinubu through posts on his verified X and Facebook accounts.

The SSS later arraigned Sowore before the Federal High Court in Abuja in December 2025 on the charges. He pleaded not guilty to all counts.

At the time, Umar granted him bail on self-recognition, citing his status as a two-time presidential candidate and noting that his international passport had already been deposited with the court. 

The judge, however, warned that the bail could be revoked if Sowore made statements capable of threatening national unity, peace, or security.

But in May 2026, the court ordered Sowore to open his defence after dismissing a no-case submission filed by his legal team. 

Umar held that the prosecution had established a prima facie case requiring the defendant to respond to the allegations.

Following that ruling, Sowore accused the judge of bias and insisted that he could no longer obtain justice before the court. He subsequently sought the judge’s recusal and requested that the matter be reassigned to another judge.

Umar directed him to file a formal application setting out the grounds for the request and fixed new date for ruling on the application.

 

Court fines ADC, Aregbesola N1m over application for judge’s recusal in Gombe’s suit

0
THE Federal High Court in Abuja on Tuesday awarded one million naira fine against the African Democratic Congress (ADC) and its embattled National Secretary, Rauf Aregbesola, adding to the party’s challenges and losses in courts. 

One of the court’s justices, Peter Lifu, awarded the fine following their application seeking the judge’s withdrawal from the suit filed by the aggrieved factional chairman of the party, Nafiu Gombe.

The ADC faction headed by former Senate President David Mark and Aregbesola had asked the judge to recuse himself from the case, citing bias.

Delivering a ruling on Tuesday, the judge held that the motions lacked merit and devoid of credible evidence, stressing that it aimed at frustrating the order of the Supreme Court for accelerated hearing of the case.

The judge held that the reasons advanced in the affidavits by the applicants were extraneous.

According to him, the court has painstakingly considered all three processes by parties and by affidavit evidence; there is no iota of bias found.

“There is no element of bias being painted by the applicants as alleged,” he said.

The judge recalled that the motions for recusal were filed, even when the court was yet to assumed jurisdictions on the case.

“Where then is the element of bias in the motions for recusal,’ he asked.

The judge, who described the applications as “an abuse of court process,” said the motions were fundamentally defective.

“The law is settled that allegations of bias are grave allegationds which are not made lightly. Whoever alleges bias must provide clear evidence. It becomes apparent that the applicants have failed completely to prove the allegations.

“It is a cheap attempt to blackmail and intimidate the court. As I said, nobody can intimidate the court,” he said.

Lifu held that judges should be careful to “accede to such baseless allegations so that they don’t allow litigants choose judges that suit them.”

He further described the applications as forum shopping.

He said the applicants made the allegations so that the case could be assigned to another judge that would do their biddings.

“Parties cannot choose which court they should be heard. Matters are assigned to judges by the administrative head of the court, and no applicant can choose who to hear and determine their matters. A judge must be firm in doing justice and not dance to the whims and caprices of counsel. No court worth its salt should allow this,” the judge said.

Lifu, who said the entire application was based on speculation, ruled that if allowed, lawyers could use it as a tool against the court when they know a case would not favour them

“On the whole, I found no merit in the application, and it is hereby dismissed with N500, 000 cost each against the applicants and in favour of plaintiff,” the judge ruled.

Earlier when the case was called, a lawyer, Kalu-Kalu Agu, who appeared for Nkemakolam Ukandu, the National Welfare Secretary of ADC, challenged the judge from delivering the ruling, having ordered the deregistration of ADC in his judgement on Monday.

NAN reports that Agu, on behalf of Ukandu, had filed a motion seeking to be joined in Gombe’s suit.

The lawyer reminded the judge of his previous day’s judgment directing the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to deregister ADC having failed to meet the constitutional threshold.

“My lord, the clerk of this court did mention the matter is slated for ruling today. In view of your lordship ruling and continuous existence of the 1st defendant (ADC) in this matter, and having been declared dead, I don’t see any reason why this ruling should continue.

“In your judgment, this court ordered INEC to deregister the 1st defendant. So, in the eye of the law, the 1st defendant is not existing,” Agu submitted.

“Are you a party in this suit?” Justice Lifu asked. “Yes, I am my lord,” Agu responded.

“Who joined you, or you joined yourself in your chambers?” the judge asked further.

Reacting, Gombe’s lawyer, Robert Emukpoeruo, a senior advocate, disagreed with Agu’s submission that he was a party in the suit.

Emukpoeruo said he was yet to read the judgement mentioned by Agu, hence, it had no relevance in the proceedings.

He said by Order 9 Rule 14(4)) of the court, until Ukandu is joined by the judge, he is yet to be a party.

When Agu attempted to respond to Emukpoeruo’s submission, the judge threatened to invoke the powers of the court on him.

Realwan Okpanachi, who appeared for Aregbesola; Suleiman Usman, a senior advocate, lawyer to Mark and Peter Oyewole, who represented Ralph Nwosu, also made their respective submissions.

In his ruling, the judge said the case was distinct from the Monday’s matter where a judgement was delivered against ADC.

After the ruling, the case was adjourned until June 23 for hearing of all pending applications.

NAN reports that Gombe, in the suit, is seeking an order restraining Mark, Aregbesola, and members of their interim National Working Committee (NWC) from parading themselves as the party’s leaders.

He had argued that the emergence of Mark, Aregbesola and other NWC members as party’s leaders breached the provisions of the party’s constitution and the Electoral Act.

Gombe had sued ADC, Mark, Aregbesola, Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and Ralph Nwosu as 1st to 5th defendants respectively in the suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/1819/2025.

Nwosu was the former ADC National Chairman who stepped down for Mark leadership of the party. (NAN)

Dorothy Njemanze warns of rising GBV cases, barriers facing survivors in Nigeria

SEXUAL and gender-based violence survivors in Nigeria continue to face overwhelming barriers to justice, healthcare, shelter and rehabilitation, according to rights advocate and founder of the Dorothy Njemanze Foundation (DNF), Dorothy Njemanze.

Speaking on violence against women and children in Nigeria in an exclusive interview with The ICIR, Njemanze, a survivor of sexual violence and intimate partner abuse, frowned at a system where survivors are often abandoned, perpetrators evade accountability, and non-governmental organisations struggle to fill gaps left by public institutions.

She said DNF, a survivor-led organisation based in Abuja, handles an average of three cases of sexual and gender-based violence daily, with at least 40 active cases monthly.

“Our services are subject to the availability of resources, but human lives are directly linked to those resources. Every human life that is lost because support was unavailable is a dent on our economy and our humanity. The foundation provides free medical referrals, legal support, shelter, psychosocial assistance and educational support for survivors across Nigeria,” she said.

Njemanze revealed that sustaining support services has become increasingly difficult due to funding shortages, noting that feeding approximately 35 survivors and vulnerable persons daily costs millions of naira annually, excluding expenses for healthcare, shelter, education, transportation and legal interventions.

The activist is widely known for a landmark legal victory against the Nigerian government at the ECOWAS Court of Justice in 2017, where the court ruled in Njemanze and three others versus Federal Republic of Nigeria, finding that Nigerian authorities violated the rights of women who were unlawfully arrested, assaulted and stigmatised as sex workers during raids in Abuja. The ruling marked one of the first major regional court decisions recognising gender-based violence under the Maputo Protocol.

Njemanze said the majority of DNF’s staff and board members are survivors of violence, giving them firsthand understanding of the challenges victims face. DNF supports survivors through shelter facilities, educational sponsorships, vocational training and community referrals. However, Njemanze said demand outpaced available resources.

“We render free confidential services around the clock to survivors of sexual and gender-based violence,” she said.

She recounted several cases handled by the foundation, including a three-year-old girl who suffered severe sexual abuse allegedly perpetrated by her father. The child was taken for medical examination after complaining of pain and was found to have injuries consistent with sexual assault.

She lamented that despite reporting such cases to authorities, prosecutions often stall for years. The activist recalled another case involving a girl who became pregnant at age 11 and delivered a baby shortly after turning 12.

“The alleged perpetrator, a man in his 30s, was arrested following intervention by the National Agency for the Prohibition of Trafficking in Persons (NAPTIP) but was later granted bail,” she said.

Njemanze expressed concern over what she described as prolonged delays in prosecuting the case despite repeated petitions, as she criticised the high cost of seeking justice, arguing that survivors are often required to shoulder medical expenses, transportation costs and legal fees before their cases can proceed.

“If a two-year-old child is raped, that child is expected to bear the full cost of medical and legal processes if justice is to be pursued. How much does a two-year-old earn?” she queried.

She further alleged that survivors frequently encounter pressure to settle cases outside formal judicial channels due to the financial burden associated with prosecution, noting that many survivors are forced back into environments where abuse occurred.

While acknowledging progress in public awareness and policy conversations around gender-based violence, Njemanze argued that government responses were inadequate compared to the scale of the crisis, as she pointed to budgetary priorities as evidence showing limited investment in justice-related interventions for survivors.

“The progress is not commensurate with what is needed in Nigeria considering our population, resources and potential,” she said.

She also renewed support for the Gender and Equal Opportunities Bill and called for stronger safeguards for children.

“Children should be completely off limits. No excuses. No ifs, no buts,” she said.

She advocated free education and healthcare support for child survivors, social protection measures and sustainable empowerment programmes rather than what she described as tokenistic interventions, and stronger prosecution of offenders,

Njemanze encouraged anyone experiencing abuse to seek help and avoid suffering in silence. “There is a community of survivors willing to stand with you and help you navigate your options. Where we cannot run, we walk. Where we cannot walk, we crawl. But we do something,” she stated.

The ICIR reports that Nigeria continues to grapple with widespread gender-based violence despite efforts by government agencies and civil society organizations like DNF.

Official figures from the Federal Ministry of Women Affairs’ Gender-Based Violence Dashboard recorded 27,698 SGBV cases between 2020 and October 2023, including 1,145 fatal cases and 393 convictions.

Globally, estimates cited by rights advocates indicate that about one in three women experience physical or sexual violence during their lifetime, highlighting the scale of the challenge facing countries such as Nigeria.

Obi reacts to court order directing INEC to deregister ADC, others

0

PRESIDENTIAL candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), Peter Obi, has criticised the Federal High Court’s order mandating the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to deregister Africa Democratic Congress (ADC), Accord and three other political parties.

He described the development as a threat to public confidence in Nigeria’s democratic and judicial institutions.

Obi in a statement posted on his X handle, warned against what he termed the growing politicisation of institutions that should remain independent and protected from political influence.

He said nations thrive when institutions are stronger than individuals and politics. He argued that the court judgement would further diminish public trust in the country’s legal system.

While calling for the reversal of the ruling, the former Anambra State governor said: “We must never sacrifice our sacred institutions on the altar of politics. Nations rise when institutions are stronger than individuals,” he said.

He recalled expressing concerns during the controversy surrounding the removal of former Chief Justice of Nigeria, Walter Onnoghen, stressing that the greatest damage such actions caused was often the perception they created about the sanctity and independence of national institutions.

According to him, strong economies are built on trust; while investors can manage security, policy and market risks, they are often discouraged by uncertainty in the rule of law and perceptions of judicial interference.

“Today, many Nigerians have lost confidence in systems that should protect them, because businesses increasingly request that their contracts be governed by foreign jurisdictions because they have greater confidence in those institutions than in our own.”

Obi pledged commitment to restoring the dignity, independence and integrity of the judiciary, stressing the need for justice to remain impartial, accessible and respected by all citizens.

He also called on judges, senior advocates, lawyers and other legal professionals to defend the rule of law and strengthen democratic institutions in the country.

The ICIR reported on Monday that the Federal High Court ordered INEC to strike out the five political parties from its register over their poor electoral performance.

The ruling, delivered on Monday by one of the court’s justices, Peter Lifu, affected the African Democratic Congress (ADC), Action Peoples Party (APP), Action Alliance (AA), Accord Party (AP), and Zenith Labour Party (ZLP).

The judge that the parties failed to satisfy constitutional conditions required for political parties to retain their registration and consequently instructed INEC to remove them from the list of recognised parties.

Lifu also ruled that the affected parties should not be allowed to take part in future elections, including the 2027 general election.

The decision followed a suit filed by the Incorporated Trustees of the National Forum of Former Legislators. The group had approached the court, arguing that the parties no longer met the legal standards needed to remain registered.

Army confirms rescue of slain former defence spokesperson’s wife

0

TROOPS of the Nigerian Army, supported by the Nigerian Air Force, have rescued Amina Abubakar, wife of the late former spokesperson of the Nigerian Army, Rabe Abubakar, weeks after she was abducted by bandits alongside her husband.

In a statement on Monday, Director of Defence Information, Samaila Uba, a major general, said the rescue followed intensified search-and-rescue operations by troops of Operation FASAN YAMMA.

According to the military, troops made contact with the bandits at Tunga Village during sustained offensive operations, leading to Amina Abubakar’s recovery.

The military said the bandits shot her before abandoning her and fleeing under pressure from advancing troops.

She was immediately evacuated to a military hospital, where she is receiving treatment and responding positively, the statement added.

Amina Abubakar was abducted alongside her husband, a retired major general, in Katsina State. Abubakar was later killed by his captors, triggering outrage and renewed concerns over insecurity in Nigeria.

The Armed Forces said efforts were ongoing to track down those responsible for the attack and rescue other victims held by criminal groups.

“The leadership of the Armed Forces of Nigeria remains committed to ensuring her full recovery and is providing all necessary support to her family during this difficult period,” the statement said.

The military added that troops would sustain operations aimed at dismantling terrorist and bandit networks in Katsina State and other parts of the country.

The late Abubakar and his wife were abducted by armed bandits in Katsina State in early June while travelling along the Funtua–Dandume Road.

Days after the abduction, The ICIR reported that the retired general had been killed by his captors despite ongoing efforts to secure the couple’s release.

He was later laid to rest in Katsina State  The burial, conducted in accordance with Islamic rites, on Saturday evening, was attended by  family members, senior military officers, government officials and residents.

 

ADC to challenge court ruling on deregistration, says government ‘playing with fire’

0

THE African Democratic Congress (ADC) has rejected a Federal High Court ruling that ordered the party’s deregistration and four others.

In a statement shortly after the court ruling on Monday, June 15, the party warned that the decision could destabilise Nigeria’s democracy.

It accused powerful interests of attempting to silence opposition voices ahead of 2027.

The ICIR reported that Peter Lifu, a justice of the Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday, directed the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to strike out the ADC, Action Alliance, Action Peoples Party, Accord Party and Zenith Labour Party from its register for allegedly failing to meet constitutional requirements for continued registration.

The judge held that the parties failed to satisfy constitutional conditions required for political parties to retain their registration and consequently instructed INEC to remove them from the list of recognised parties.

Lifu also ruled that the affected parties should not be allowed to take part in future elections, including the 2027 general election.

The case was filed by the Incorporated Trustees of the National Forum of Former Legislators, which argued that the parties had not met electoral performance thresholds required under the Constitution.

But in its reaction, the ADC described the judgment as “reckless and incendiary,” insisting there was no legal basis for deregistration.

The party said INEC had previously affirmed in court filings that it had not breached any registration conditions and argued that deregistration must be based strictly on constitutional grounds, not political pressure.

It also faulted the court process, alleging disregard for a subsisting Court of Appeal order staying proceedings in the matter, and warned that such actions undermine judicial integrity.

The ADC further alleged political interference, linking the case to actors within the ruling establishment and questioning the neutrality of key government officials involved in the suit.

It described the timing of the ruling, which it said came after its primaries, as suspicious, warning that attempts to remove opposition parties through judicial means amount to “an invitation to anarchy.”

The party vowed to challenge the decision through all legal channels, including a petition to the National Judicial Council.

While insisting it would remain on the ballot in the coming polls, the ADC urged supporters to remain calm but vigilant, saying Nigeria’s democracy must not be reduced to “judicial manipulation” or “political exclusion.”

Court orders INEC to deregister ADC, Accord, 3 other parties

0

A FEDERAL High Court sitting in Abuja has directed the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to strike out five political parties from its register over their poor electoral performance.

The ruling, delivered on Monday by one of the court’s justices, Peter Lifu, affected the African Democratic Congress (ADC), Action Peoples Party (APP), Action Alliance (AA), Accord Party (AP), and Zenith Labour Party (ZLP).

According to TheCable, the judge held that the parties failed to satisfy constitutional conditions required for political parties to retain their registration and consequently instructed INEC to remove them from the list of recognised parties.

Lifu also ruled that the affected parties should not be allowed to take part in future elections, including the 2027 general election.

The decision followed a suit filed by the Incorporated Trustees of the National Forum of Former Legislators. The group had approached the court, arguing that the parties no longer met the legal standards needed to remain registered.

INEC was listed as the first defendant in the case, while the Attorney-General of the Federation was also joined as a party.

According to the plaintiffs, the political organisations failed to demonstrate the level of electoral support required under the Constitution. They maintained that political parties are expected to achieve certain benchmarks during elections, including obtaining at least 25 per cent of votes in specified contests or securing elective positions.

The forum asked the court to determine whether INEC had a constitutional obligation to remove parties that failed to meet the requirements contained in Section 225A of the 1999 Constitution, as amended.

It further requested an order compelling the electoral body to delist the parties before preparations for the 2027 elections begin in earnest.

The plaintiffs additionally sought restrictions preventing the affected parties from conducting primaries, holding campaign activities, organising political gatherings, or participating in electoral processes until they comply with constitutional provisions.

In his judgment, the judge agreed with the arguments presented by the plaintiffs and ordered INEC to deregister the five parties.